WldFyre

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

1/3=0.333...

2/3=0.666...

3/3=0.999...=1

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ISO is not a source for mathematical definitions

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Because you don't have a position, hence why you just whine about being victimized like the bad-faith conservative you are instead of re-iterating or clarifying anything. Go ahead and claim I've committed another formal fallacy on an informal discussion site instead of using your words like an adult, you commies are all so predictable smh. Materialism really does lend itself to anti-intellectuals who think they're so smart, doesn't it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (11 children)

this, too, does not change the truth of what i’ve said

That's true, because what you said holds no truth at all. I pointed out the flaws in your point and your "argument" was that since no one is vegan, veganism isn't better for the environment. Which is so monumentally stupid I'm convinced you're trolling.

"The vast majority of people are not communist, therefore communism wouldn't be better for workers."

"The world isn't powered by renewables, therefore renewables aren't better than coal."

"Things aren't currently better, so no change would make it better."

You're arguing from a position of complete nonsense, and it's not an "appeal to ridicule" to call out bad logic and sealioning tactics. Link literally any source that backs your conservative, status-quo reinforcing position, or go read something other then century old rich men philosophizing about societies they daydreamed up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (14 children)

You've said nothing except for flat denial and asserting illogical nonsense lol

Go back to talking about cryptocurrency and communism, because that has definitely resulted in material improvements for people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (16 children)

You have made no points to refute, and ridicule is how you handle low effort trolls.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (18 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Thankfully, facts are true whether you believe them or not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (22 children)

Lol you're fucking hilarious, I thought the self-professed communist would appreciate advocating for a better system but it turns out you're just a goofball

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I said more than that, your "rebuttal" isn't a rebuttal either, it's word vomit and an appeal to futility.

If you're trolling, then 10/10

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Saying you're disappointed with what girls do to their bodies is mad weird, though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (27 children)

Lmfao that's your argument?? It's in "not even wrong" territory, literally what on earth are you talking about lol

Coal pollution is also higher now than when renewable energy was first invented, therefore renewables wouldn't help us! /s

view more: ‹ prev next ›