Wes4Humanity

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Haven't heard her say anything about the genocide except "shut up about it, I'm talking"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

If you put some bacteria in a petri dish, they might even up creating a very complex system... But they'll always be constrained by the petri dish. We can look at the petri dish and say it's having XYZ effect, without necessarily having to get too into the weeds about the complexities of what's happening inside the dish.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

One major problem with our current economic system is that it allows a small group of people to limit resources that would not naturally have to be limited (false scarcity). Sort of like if the rules called for throwing baseballs at people's heads to see the effects of TBIs.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Oh they are definitely insisting it isn't happening, it's like they forgot the Internet exists now and we're all watching it happen in real-time

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The economy is not a natural phenomenon, it was designed... Economists explaining "how things work" is like someone explaining how baseball works... That's great, but it's time to change to an entirely different game, so you telling me how baseball works is worthless

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Ugh... We need ranked choice so bad

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

"The war to end war" (also "The war to end all wars";[1] originally from the 1914 book The War That Will End War by H. G. Wells) is a term for the First World War of 1914–1918. Originally an idealistic slogan, it is now mainly used sardonically,[2] since not only was the First World War not history's final war, but its aftermath also indirectly contributed to the outbreak of the even more devastating Second World War.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_war_to_end_war

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Imagine if all those people stood together against genocide instead of dividing over it. Women alone are like half the population... Why are they siding with genocide? They could elect anyone they want. Anyone with health insurance? That's almost everyone. Bam, anyone they want. If a gay person votes for genocide how much should I really give a shit about them? There's no "meaningful choice" because the libs get out early saying so... But if it's not this election then certainly by the next one, millennials and zoomers are gonna be done with the old boomer parties.. And good riddance

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

They've probably also figured out how many people saying that will actually fold with a little arm twisting. Would be super interesting to see those numbers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

They only need to do that math in the swing states as well... But I wish someone would just show the math. Like, let's see the projections for Zionist gains vs anti genocide losses in Pennsylvania... Even just one study and I'd be like, okay, there's a legit reason for the gaslighting and bullshit. Gotta win to do anything.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

Maga: don't threaten me with a good time

view more: ‹ prev next ›