Waraugh

joined 2 years ago
[–] Waraugh 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Weird, I can get to it now. Thank you so much for following up and sorry for wasting your time. Those guards are really cool, it isn’t what I envisioned at all, your approach is really sleek!

[–] Waraugh 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

That link doesn’t load for me? I’m really interested in what you designed. I tried turning my WiFi off and use cellar in case my pihole was interfering but that didn’t load either. Any chance the link formatting got messed up or something?

[–] Waraugh 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah and I’ve worked for a company that stupidly put their vpn service on 192.168.1.0/24 so most peoples home network would act weird as hell whenever they connect to the work vpn. That’s a poor implementation and shouldn’t be done. Address conflicts are certainly annoying especially when it’s a black box but that’s not a reason to shoehorn everything over to IPv6. I can’t imagine a scenario ever existing that I would have any desire for everything in my house to be uniquely reachable to the world. I have a point of presence to the internet behind my Palo Alto, what I do inside there is incredibly simple with IPv4 and interoperates seamlessly with IPv6. This idea that everything needs to be raw dogging the internet, especially with the current state, or lack of, information security makes no sense to me. Talking about IPv6 not being fully implemented as some sort of critique is ignorant, shows a complete lack of use case analysis, usually erodes away after someone spends a year or so in the real world, and isn’t the gotcha folks seem to think it is.

[–] Waraugh 1 points 1 month ago

Ok? That use case has been solved. You can still use private IPv4 addressing and everything will just work because carrier service providers have solved those limitations.

[–] Waraugh 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They both have use cases and are interoperable. I don’t see why folks think it’s so odd that they are both used and will likely continue to be used. It’s hardly even a topic worth talking about. Seems like one of those things people hear about being around for a long time as an updated standard and it’s some kind of gotcha that not everything uses it…What driver do these people imagine exists to not use IPv4, the addressing limit was solved before IPv6 even hit the street and has only matured and integrated with IPv6 since.

[–] Waraugh 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I’m glad the conversation happened, I typically tune out any celebrity news and this turned out to be a good discussion to read and learn more about. I can’t say I’ve ever held an opinion about any of these celebrity folks beyond being entitled trash but I agree with the conclusion you presented that I’m replying to.

[–] Waraugh 1 points 1 month ago

I am fairly confident everyone I know IRL operates at stage 1-3? Where do you live, I want to move.

[–] Waraugh 2 points 1 month ago

I don’t think it’s ironic, it just doesn’t say the quiet part out loud. Everything just works if they control the entire ecosystem, so if you want ‘sophisticated’ let us control everything and it will all just work.

[–] Waraugh 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just watched that video. Holy cow…I’m speechless, thank you for sharing. That seems like a really cool show.

[–] Waraugh 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh wow, I know who he is but didn’t recognize him in the clip. I don’t seem to be able to recognize/associate people by how they look. Most people I’m close to think I’m lying or trying to be funny because I don’t know who popular people are, it would be nice to be able to recognize people.

Also, thank you for sharing the clip, I’m going to watch the full episode tonight.

[–] Waraugh 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

What’s that guy doing?

[–] Waraugh 4 points 1 month ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›