Vreyan31

joined 3 months ago
[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 16 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Cops do not like confronting actual criminals - criminals are dangerous. But they love to intimidate and force total acquiescence from regular people and excuse it by saying 'its what we have to do 'in case' they are a criminal'.

Once criminals figure out that cops don't want to confront them, those criminals learn to accommodate that. So they get worse. They figure out who they can rob and intimidate with impunity - and it's mostly the poor. But also, they can break into middle class people's cars, porch pirate, even B&E into homes, and cops don't want to deal with that. So many people post on reddit bc cops won't do a thing if, for example, a disabled person has their motorized wheelchair stollen, so people try to play detective on their own. Have a stalker or an ex who has credibly threatened your life? That might only help them catch that person if you are actually murdered.

Cops deter crime in wealthy areas, but the rest of us are on our own.

Fear of being caught might deter the naive from testing if they can get away with shit, but in reality, there is essentially a truce between cops and criminals, and if you know how to be too much work and risk to bother catching, a lot of what we consider 'criminals' don't have a lot to worry about.

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 17 points 1 month ago

I have no idea but whether they did or not is irrelevant.

Protesting is constitutionally protected speech even for lawmakers, and has no bearing on their rights as elected officials to tour those facilities.

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

3 or 2-with-5's-handle

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is brilliant - make the protests artistically interesting.

Most of the grown-up theater kids are already there anyway.

The main challenge will be making sure the message is still seen as serious. But I think your idea about showing how MAGA are on the opposite side as someone most of them claim to worship is brilliant.

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That is how many cis men think, and we are talking about her risk going into a space where there frequently won't be any other witnesses.

It is not a weird thing to say, it is a relevant point.

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even if you trade in, you aren't leaving with a different car without a higher monthly payment unless you take a major downgrade in automobile. A lot of people can't afford a higher payment right now.

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

Not who you asked, but I would happily give anyone the benefit of the doubt about having any sense of who Musk really is who bought their car before Musk bought twitter in 2023.

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

I know several people who are struggling who bought used Teslas so they could use them for Uber gigs.

You can argue that was not a smart idea and I'd agree. But vulnerable people are just people, and people are not always effective strategists.

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 8 points 2 months ago

I'm not up for punishing individuals, especially those who may have bought their cars well before Musk even bought twitter.

Well. Cybertrucks have only been out since his mask was off. I'm less concerned about vandalizing those.

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

To all those saying, "but why shouldn't men want to be cared for?"

This meme plays into a narrative the makes women subservient.

It suggests that only men "battle", and that being a man and "battling" entities them to care by women.

No where in this is acknowledgement that women have burdens too, and that all people benefit from care.

No where in this is any hint of reciprocity. If anything, it implies that the "joy" of taking care of "her man" should be enough.

No. Walk the fuck on. Having a penis doesn't entitle you to one-sided care.

The other thing implied by this - that women should 'naturally' be able to fix 'her man'. But if a woman in broken? Oof - 'she has Daddy issues' and better fix herself, right?

And what if a woman tries to fix 'her man' and fails? Oh look - isnt that convenient - society just took all his faults and made them her failures. Wow! Who wouldn't want to sign up for that??

And just look at that success rate. You can count up the number of women killed by intimate partners and see how great this plan is.

Society really needs to get past this childish narrative that tells men they should expect to find a manic pixie dream girl who lives only to make him happy. Men make fun of girls for believing in Prince Charming, but this is truly the more destructive fairy tale.

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, research on prisoners and concentration camp victims did produce new valuable medical information.

Most of the field of gynecology is based on experiments done on women slaves, where the "doctors" decided their victims conveniently didn't have nerve endings.

Ethics throttles research.

But I am aghast at the thought that we should permit unethical research in the pursuit of, at the end of the day, greed.

And I say this as a professional scientist.

I can't believe this conversation is even necessary.

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Why do Unions have to be considered Left?"

Tell me you have no idea about the history of labor rights without telling me...

view more: ‹ prev next ›