V0ldek

Eagerly awaiting the lawsuit and discovery where it'll turn out the datasets for Sky were completely accidentally called scajo_01.dat through scajo_42.dat.

From what I gathered it was about "since I invented blockchain now I own a percentage of every crypto project ever because intellectual property/patent law/vibes".

I think he was also selling something? So clout and publicity.

All of AI is just this. A boring person's idea of creativity. A manager's idea of programming. A stupid person's idea of science.

now you might think this is an issue of settled case law, but the computer brain boys are confident in their version of how things work

Are we talking about blockchain crimes again?

Falso

Quality shitpost, top tier SIGBOVIK content, especially appreciate this:

Orch-OR

Never heard of this thing but just reading through the wiki

An essential feature of Penrose's theory is that the choice of states when objective reduction occurs is selected neither randomly (as are choices following wave function collapse) nor algorithmically. Rather, states are selected by a "non-computable" influence embedded in the Planck scale of spacetime geometry.

Neither randomly nor alorithmically, rather magically. Like really, what the fuck else could you mean by "non-computable" in there that would be distinguishable from magic?

Penrose claimed that such information is Platonic, representing pure mathematical truths, which relates to Penrose's ideas concerning the three worlds: the physical, the mental, and the Platonic mathematical world. In Shadows of the Mind (1994), Penrose briefly indicates that this Platonic world could also include aesthetic and ethical values, but he does not commit to this further hypothesis.

And this is just crankery with absolutely no mathematical meaning. Also pure mathematical truths are not outside of the physical world, what the fuck would that even mean bro.

I thought Penrose was a smart physicist, the hell is he doing peddling this.

and it’s obvious Emergentism is bullshit because making machines smarter doesn’t make them conscious

This is like 101 of bad logic, "this sentence is false because I failed to prove it just now".

I never claimed to be good at self-restraint okay, everyone has their vices

You're acting as if you never ate a full bar of chocolate after you told yourself you wouldn't

In a worst case scenario if my local lawyer can use AI to generate a letter and just quickly go through it to make sure it didn’t hallucinate, they can process more clients, offer faster service and cheaper prices.

It's a good thing people are so good at vigilance tasks and don't tend to fall onto just relying on the automation.

Lol, it literally takes 5s to search for this, come up with the book and read

The defendant has offered evidence of having acted in self-defense.

as the first sentence. How could you claim having that memorised wouldn't help?

FPGA systems researchers: with this clever trick we can make the chip have 36% lower surface area and use 14% less energy!

Worst people you know: haha gpus go brrrrrrrrrrr