UniversalMonk

joined 5 months ago
MODERATOR OF
3
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Ned Kelly was an Australian outlaw, known for his defiant stand against colonial authorities in the late 19th century, culminating in his capture and execution after leading a rebellion against the police.

The Jerilderie Letter doesn't explicitly mention anarchism, but its themes align pretty good with anarchist principles.

Ned Kelly criticizes the established authority, particularly the colonial legal system, and speaks out against police brutality and the exploitation of his family, which aligns with anarchist critiques of state power and hierarchical structures.

His rejection of authority and advocacy for justice and equality can be seen as a precursor to some of the anti-authoritarian ideas found in anarchist thought.

 

Thanks to [email protected]

Declaration of Educational Warfare — A Manifesto from the Classroom Frontlines

This is not a reform. This is a rebellion.

I wrote this as a public declaration—because the education system is not broken.

It was built this way.

What we call “school” is often just a pipeline: from trauma, to obedience, to silence. This isn’t about fixing it. This is about burning it down and building something that actually nurtures minds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Switch accounts from where? What are you even talking about?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

Nice denial attempt, bro.

Cheers.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

What are you even going on about? I'm not sure what you are looking for. I posted a news article I found interesting. That's all there is to it. Then you started talking about me pussying out, blocking you, etc.

Dude, I don't give a fuck. It's just Lemmy. I didn't write the article.

Cheers, mate.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

This mentality of blocking anything you disagree with and creating a cozy little echo chamber is deeply harmful.

Agreed. Maybe you can tell that to the legion of Lemmy's that start threads and try to get me banned from the entire fediverse.

feel free to pussy out and block me though. It certainly fits your character.

I don't have anyone blocked. So if I've never blocked anyone, how does blocking fit my character?!

You can try to call me about anytime you want. But I haven't done anything but post an article. I didn't write it. And I won't change my mind because of your rage. So feel free, friend!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

Every post you make is just the shittiest possible take on the subject.

Then you should just ignore or block my posts. Cuz I ain't gonna change my mind just because I don't subscribe to Lemmy-think.

It’s like whoever controls your account painstakingly researches every issue in order to share whatever the opposite of the correct position is

Lemmy isn't big enough, popular enough, or even known enough to make any part of that comment you just made, logical.

You're are taking this way too seriously. Most people don't even know what Lemmy is. There's not some shadowy supergroup trying to change political recourse. What the actual fuck are you thinking?! lmao

Go outside to a public park, friend. Tell people people that you are excited about a forum called, Lemmy. Tell me what happens when you do that! lolol

Hell, most average people don't even know what Reddit is, and it's a thousand times more popular than Lemmy.

Go. Outside.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (8 children)

Because I can think whatever I want. And I can do whatever I want. Even if it annoys you.

I don't have to answer to anyone. Especially some spoiled Lemmy commenter who's mad because some people have to go into a office and work for extraordinarily high pay. lol

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (10 children)

Sounds like you’re a typical alienated bootlicker who doesn’t know how to think for himself.

Except like I said, I’m financially independent, entirely debt-free, and retired.

How am I a bootlicker who can't think for myself, since I don't have to answer to anybody? I can do whatever I want, whenever I want, wherever I want.

Actually it sounds like *you’re *a typical alienated bootlicker and spoiled brat who doesn’t know how to think for himself.

Thanks, amiko!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago

Why would they quit if they have a cushy work from home job

Because they don't have a cushy work from home job. Boss is making them go into the office. :)

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago

These people get compensated very very well. They can handle going into the office. Or they can try to find another job. They are not forced to work there. I am fine with this stance.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (14 children)

I agree with him because I like his views and his work ethic. I don't thin the majority of people should be able to work from home if their bosses don't want them to. If they don't like that, then they can get a different job that does allow them to work from home.

Dude, I'm financially independent, entirely debt-free, and retired. I don't give a fuck about what people "in authority" tell me.

Thanks, amiko!

view more: next ›