Unaware7013

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If he waits too long, the ballots are already printed and he can't do shit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (6 children)

You mean like the impeachment or any of the trials we've had for his criminal behavior? Yeah, why didn't they do that immediately??? And while we're at it, why does the legal system move so slowly???

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

People don't elect the president, land does. So sure, let's let him run once 1 person = 1 vote. Until then, fuck the traitor, land shouldn't get to put someone in office that tried to perform a soft coup.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Great idea, don't hold former presidents to account when they attempt to subvert democracy, that won't have any consequences at all!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

There is an argument to be made that the president is a “federal officer” so the ruling does stand

What's the argument that he's not a federal officer? Basically everything in the Constitution refers to the office of the presidency, so claiming the president isn't an officer sounds like some bullshit that idiots would come up with. Which makes sense why the republicans are trying that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Is it though? A dead kid is less likely to be abused than a live one. If you look at it that way, republicans are just doing their best to solve children's problems 🤢🤮

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not one or the other though, we're both right. It's a problem they they're trying to make pride political, along with banning of speech that causes no harm to anyone. B

ut at least this is so blatantly unconstitutional and subject to be turned around and used against them if it stands that there's no way it will survive a constitutional review.

[–] [email protected] 94 points 2 years ago (4 children)

How can the government just overstep on Canadians' first amendment rights? Don't they know what the US founding fathers stood for? The right of Canadians to say whatever they want to whomever they want without fear of any consequences!!!1!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

A significant amount of Americans support a would be dictator who would gladly make himself dictator for life, but that doesn't make it American behavior.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 2 years ago

I absolutely love how the TST actually stands for the shit christians have pretended to care about for centuries.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Does Florida not understand what the first amendment is for? Because I'm pretty sure that this is EXACTLY the sort of overreach that it was written to prevent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Wow, I like the one guy farther down who claims Likud is awful but it's Hamas propaganda that the IDF kills kids.... like the massive dead civilian and kid numbers are just all propaganda to make a genocidal ethnistate look bad.

view more: ‹ prev next ›