TrippaSnippa

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

The Sydney airport line uses the exact same rolling stock as the rest of the suburban network (and the airport stations are just stops along the line, not their own dedicated line). The surcharge is just revenue raising because the train is the easiest way to get to the airport, so fuck you, pay up.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

By not taking any other jobs in the meantime I guess

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why the hell does the US get to decide what we do with our tanks?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

That's fair, I was talking specifically about Melbourne. However, the redistribution doesn't account for the swing against Bandt. The ABC's analysis put his first preference vote nominally on ~45% after redistribution, but he only got 39.5% (and I believe their swing figures are adjusted for redistributions, which is why they show Bennelong as a Labor gain from the Liberals even though Labor previously held the seat).

You're completely right about Brisbane though (and the same thing nearly happened in Ryan). The swing against the Greens alone wouldn't have dropped them out of the 2CP, the massive surge for Labor at the expense of the LNP was what did it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The precipitous drop in support for the LNP mostly went to help Labor (side note: for weird historical reasons, our party spells its name the American way, despite in every other context in Australia, labour having a u), which helped them finish ahead of the Greens on 3-candidate-preferred, which meant the Greens got eliminated and their votes went to support a Labor victory. In essence, a drop in support for the right-wing candidates resulted in a centrist candidate winning where previously a left-wing candidate had won. That's an aberrant result that doesn't really match anyone's intuition of how elections should work. And it's one reason a proportional system would be better.

This isn't what happened though. Bandt had a 5.2% swing away from him on first preferences which seems to have gone largely to Labor, who had a 5.7% swing towards them. The Liberals actually had a miniscule swing of 0.2% towards them. That swing away from the Greens and towards Labor pushed them ahead of the Libs into the 2 candidate preferred count, where they won on Liberal preferences.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It also says "must not be the same as any of the last seven passwords used" so I can only take "no repeats" to mean no repeated characters.

Requiring passwords to be exactly 8 characters is especially ridiculous because even if they're cheaping out on bytes of storage, that's completely cancelled out by the fact that they're storing the last seven passwords used.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To think that the reason we have preferential voting is because it benefitted the conservative parties of the day...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

At 8.24pm, less than half an hour after the final polls closed in Western Australia, 9News projected Labor had won the election.

This makes it sound like the result arrived extraordinarily quickly (which, in fairness, it was a very fast call) but elections here are decided entirely in the eastern states. It was obvious that the swing was on and Labor were clear favourites to win before polls in WA even closed.

By far the best news of the night though was that Temu Trump (Peter Dutton) lost his own seat just like Pierre Polievre in Canada several days ago. That makes him the first opposition leader to lose their own seat at a federal election.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I've been asking myself the same question lately. If Maccas is nearly the same price as an actually good burger, why not just get the good burger?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We used to have a "baby bonus" payment about 20 years ago in Australia. It made very little difference to birth rates and was derisively called the "plasma TV bonus". Turns out that even 20 years ago a small lump sum of cash wasn't enough to persuade people to sign up for a lifetime of expenses and responsibilities by having more kids. It was just a handout to middle class families that could already afford to have kids, which is why it was scrapped.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

How many playing card packs have you been opening? Generally you want to optimise your deck by cutting it down but I have had a good run with a big deck build with the right jokers to make it work.

view more: ‹ prev next ›