Tobberone

joined 2 years ago
[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

I've wanted something like that thumb keyboard since I had my Xperia mini pro in 2010!

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think the IEA chart looks into where the energy began, not what it was used for. The 50% number rings true to me, at least for the heating in cold winters. As for summers, cooling is a heat issue as well, so that's where much of the energy is spent.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

On a personal level, its price, but to enact a national strategy takes more, struggles with supply is one such thing. But the way to the strategy will work is through subsidies, like we've seen before.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

I think Toms give Nvidia to much cred. There is nothing to suggest that day zero isn't 20/1-25 for both lines, nor does it exclude the RTX 5000 series workstation cards (which is also Ada) from either graph, as "desktop" is as much a formfactor as anything else.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Which has yet to be realised. Of it is that fast and easy to set up I'm we will see loads of them going up in notime. Specially now in the US, given how the mindset of the current administration.

Not to mention China which invests heavily in anything able to produce a watt.

Nothing to hinder advancing nuclear in the world's 2 biggest economies! Problem solved.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

And nuclear cant possibly be built in time, so I guess we are screwed. Don't let perfect stand in the way of good. Doing nothing is not an option.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Oh, by all means. Build nuclear to your heart's delight, but in the meantime we need to build wind, solar and water as well.

The part that annoys me the most are the ones that think that it is either or. It's not. It's as much as possible as fast as possible to replace as much fossil in total volume as possible.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago

Because the correct answer to his question is: "First day on the job, huh?"

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or we skip to the obvious conclusion:

Tio little, too late.

It will take too long to implement and will not solve the energy need when it is done. And it will cost more than anyone wants to pay.

Pushing nuclear, is just a strategy to obfuscate the discussion and prolong the life of oil infrastructure.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Yeah, and in a city with no greenery for kids to play in and afraid to let the kids out of their sight for 1 minute.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Det var med mening. Nu måste de inte stötta Ukraina och kan stötta Ryssland. Enda anledningen till att de försökte få de att se ut som att de stöttade Ukraina var att det kanske fanns en chans att utpressa Ukraina att ge dem mer pengar.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Given how successful the designs Keller has been on are, this kind of news adds expectations. In 3-5 years time, of course, but even so.

view more: ‹ prev next ›