Hope he follows through where aoc failed
Thesilverpig
My only hope is that AI like early social media and web services is supported by mountains of vc cash offering services at a loss in order to build users and familiarity, and while it'll continue to exist after it has to shift to a profitable business model, it'll essentially be relagated to corners of the economy where it makes sense and they'll stop trying to hamstring it into everything.
Warmonger pushes for and predicts war? Wow. I'm shocked.
Disney world is already a ghost town.
IDC 2.0 baby! As long as the governor/defacto head of the new York democratic party is in the tank they'll sand bag him however they can.
Was that real?
Probably, it's super common as a union busting tactic. Because once labor is organized you can't really put that cat back in the bag.
up to you, and your sense of style. I think it looks fine.
They came on TV every day for a year and a half telling us about Iraq's WMD's and we were scared and confused after 9/11.
Now there was no inciting incident, we have the internet with alternative narratives to the state lies, we have a massively depressed economy from decades of wars gutting our middle class and transferring wealth from the middle class to the elite, and they are trying to speed run there propaganda about Iran in like two weeks using the same tired lies they pushed for during Iraq.
So, in their mind it's just like Iraq, but there is a reason this war only has about 16% support with 64% against. This war will break maga and will break the US before it breaks Iran. That's my guess anyways.
Oh, and Iran has almost 4 times the population as Iraq did when we invaded it, has witnessed Iraq and Lybia and have been developing and importing weapons independent of the US sphere of influence for decades while Saddam was a US puppet until he wasn't. So yeah, I don't think it'll go the same.
The verbiage is a little funky in this case. This war is definitely one of Israeli aggression but Iran is indeed launching counterattacks on Israel. I don't necessarily think OP was trying to say otherwise, they possibly just used the term attack instead of strike.
wasn't it about 82% of Israelis that supported the forced expulsion of Palestinians? I'm all for having sympathy for the innocent, just doesn't seem like there are that many innocents there.
It was incredibly stupid to use diplomatic tools so brazenly for war. Burned all credibility and for what, got a couple of sites maybe...