I did. There is nothing there explaining why they need help in any other way than any other disadvantaged group.
TheHolm
Quoting you.
because first nations people are well below the rest of us? How you can interpreted this in any other way ? Why first nation need different treatment form any other disadvantaged group? ( This is exactly what was missing in SBS article you linked in other branch)
Thanks for link. But article does not explain why they need voice more than any other minor group. There are many groups which was wrong in the past, why they are not getting voice?
So you now claiming that they are inferior than other humans. 😱 So they need help to get to same level? Man, this it pure racism.
Sorry. if it not prejudicial than it justified. How you justify one race over other?
IMHO It will set very bad precedent and focusing nation on past. Aboriginals are not only group which was wronged. But agree it is just opinion piece.
From top of my head they are 3.8% of population. So they should be heard for that 3.8%. And about Ignored, I'm not claiming it is wrong, but could you please provide some references.
How it is not discrimination if treatment is different based on race?
Only in second part and I clear state it. Do not be naive, politics is shit show.
Differences is. First nation people has exactly same right as anyone else. They already have representation via normal election.
Answered in other branch
I guess everyone is misinterpreting judges words. They was judged for assault, not for been Neo Nazis. I'm not sure what kind of sense you can get for thing like this, but 3 days is definitely a joke.