SufferingSteve

joined 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why the annoying music...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

If you sit in a room and you can see the bars, you know you are trapped, if you sit in a room, but you cant see the bars, you are going to think you are free

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

It really is, knowingly supporting someone who is openly evil, is obviously worse than unknowingly supporting someone who is evil, but tries to hide it.

We should not let people be openly evil, it just feels like a real stupid move.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I don't understand what you want said with that statement, that two party systems are better? Just as good as multi party systems? That they are all bad so you should just take your pick and be happy?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Dude, you forgot that it had built in led control. We all should know by know that gaming = leds

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, you are not even paying for minutes yet

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Two party systems spells doom. It enforces us vs them.

It's the first indicator that something is wrong with the democratic system. Basically, democracy requires multiple opinions and have to be more nuanced than yes/no, or party1/party1. It has to be a discussion amongst the currently elected parties until an acceptable solution for the majority of members is reached. Thus only having two opposing parties will basically crumble democracy, since the discussion, the basis of democracy will not happen, and the minority will always loose.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I like the idea, but I don't really feel this is scoring decentralization at all.

Yeah,looking through this again, it really scores centralization, and also focuses way to much on ease of setup. Which honestly has nothing to do with it. If it's super hard to setup, but every participant is hosting their own node. And producing the same amount of content. That would be max decentralization.

I would also argue that a requirement for decentralization is that the service keeps working even if a large portion of all nodes goes down, the remaining nodes are still operational and keep delivering the value.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe they would act as a uniting force? :D

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah, but we suck at enforcing it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Mr Fuck Sense buys all the shares and products

view more: ‹ prev next ›