Stumblinbear

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oat milk is objectively worse in taste. I actually hate it

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

His problem wasn't offering the deal, his problem was saying yes after they called his bluff

He like.. actually legally agreed to it before he looked into it at all. What a fucking dumbass

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are you kidding? The government will dig themselves deeper into debt with or without it. Regardless, "I can't stop giving people cancer because otherwise it would cut into my profits" is a uniquely shitty thing to say.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Holy fuckin moly I'm in favor of more sick leave, but a year before the government takes over is a little fuckin crazy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

CA has 1 hour for every 30 hours, though yeah you can only earn 48 per year. It's bullshit

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Continuous sick leave is different from sick days. Many states require sick leave, and the US guarantees 12 weeks leave through FMLA, though it's unpaid, with the government picking up payments after that (iirc). Regardless, a metric ton of companies offer paid long-term sick leave by just carrying insurance policies that pay out your salary if you have a doctor's note.

I have unlimited vacation time which also applies to sick days, and the company pushes people to use it. I'm looking to have taken around six weeks this year.

I'm aware this is not a common occurrence, but it's not as though there's absolutely no laws around this and nobody has paid sick days at all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oh man "maybe some contain some things that might cause cancer maybe possibly in laboratory testing on mice, and even only if you absolutely fucking drown yourself in it" against "smoking is always known to and will absolutely cause cancer, including to people around you." Yeah definitely the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, he didn't do anything on it for almost three years, so I'd say it wasn't really a priority

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

They support money, and showing you the ad gets google more money. This isn't some ideological thing, they just like money. It's not rocket science.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I have the opposite tendencies. I much prefer flat UI over the tacky bezeled borders or bubble/graphics/garbage of Old™.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They actually care quite a lot. Google ranks you down if this occurs frequently through a metric called Cumulative Layout Shift. You can also be put into confirm click status if you do this egregiously, which basically means you have to click "yes" after clicking an ad before you go to the actual page. It has a huge negative effect on revenue.

view more: ‹ prev next ›