Stumblinbear

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I like the post but had to downvote it because the English is atrocious

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There are common, well-known tracking parameters that Google uses such as the ones starting with "utm_"

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

Oh sure I'm not a huge fan of the GPU shortages, though very few crypto things need them anymore

a solution for a non-existing problem

Depends entirely on where you live and if you trust your government, but yes the USA and most Europen countries are fine in general. I personally just prefer anything that can be decentralized. That's why I'm on Lemmy, after all, haha

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Which shitshow? Imo that's like saying the internet is forever stained by whatever "shitshow" there was. It's just a technology, there are good and bad applications

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

One could argue that we're paying for it without our consent

One could argue that the Flying Spaghetti Monster exists. That doesn't make it remotely true.

Google doesn't pay anything in taxes

Uh. Google pays a shitload in taxes. There hasn't been a single year that they HAVEN'T paid taxes. They paid 11 billion in income taxes alone in 2022.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

DDG doesn't really compare to Google search results. I can hardly find anything I'm looking for when it's pretty much always on the first page of Google

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Which is really unfortunate because there are some actually useful, neat projects

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nebula can only afford to do that because basically nobody who subs to nebula actually watches the videos on it. They did a video about their revenue model and people treat it as a way to support the creators, not to actually watch content

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

They'd absolutely 100% be losing money with a $2 ad free tier. Ads make significantly more than that per user per month. Same with your """solution""" for higher res video. Bandwidth is goddamn expensive.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I mean you didn't buy it before so why would you now? You don't need excuses. You just don't want to pay for it. Own it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Honestly, I'd be fine with even 20. Much more than that and I'd be questioning it pretty hard. I watch YouTube tons and know how goddamn expensive cloud bandwidth is so I'm biased

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Probably because it's less noisy in small text

view more: ‹ prev next ›