U
SteveXVII
joined 2 years ago
The claim you were challenging was me saying I was not uncivil because I attacked racist ideology, not individuals.
The claim I was challenging was that it was racist in the first place. That's all I was doing in this thread.
Harry Brewis (hbomberguy)
You were claiming I was uncivil,
I think you are confusing me with someone else.
Maybe in hindsight I should've shared a link instead of a screenshot, but I checked the conversation again and I haven't seen a reply that changes the matter imo.
All I did was posting screenshots asking if this was the conversation you were talking about and pointing out how I think one of the things you said was inaccurate. Since you were bringing this claim here, I figured that that was okay to adress it here.
None of my statements were attacking anything except for racist ideology.
It seems to me that amzd compared speciesism to racism, specifically to condemn speciesism, and by extention factory farms. Not to condone racism.
The step you need, to go from "racism is wrong" to "speciesism is wrong" is to extend your circle of compassion to all sentient animals and not just humans.
This is a direct quote from them that this is based on.
Is this the conversation you're talking about?
Goodbye