Spawn7586

Damn, be careful, if you watch a disney movie make sure that ghere are no children in the room. You wouldn't want them to see those sexual fetishes. Don't play any games like those filthy ratchet and clanck or sonic or any similar ones either. You may have a problem understanding what is sexual. Are you against sandals too? Some consider feet sexual.

I love that this is exactly what he said, but you say that you are with his parents on this.

Yep, it was a PR stunt to show how tough they are to "criminals".

I'm an outsider and I don't negate anything you saw or felt. I was answering about what you wrote that looked incoherent since you first said you didn't hate 3rd party voters and then said they were making you rage with what they allegedly posted. Glad that at the end of your post you clarified that I misunderstood what you meant. Don't make them rage like that, hate is their fuel not yours.

I mean, the recent discoveries actually do not dispute most of the previous theories. Most of the time the old theories are fringe cases where some parameters are simplified so you get the new theory that is actually a general case of the classical one. It's not like our old formulas stop working when we discover new cases...

I mean, from an outsider point of view, it looks like people who voted a 3rd party voted for what they believed. People who voted dems voted against what they believed trying to win and then are projecting some "justice warrior" idea onto who voted what they actually wanted to vote. I rarely see someone saying they voted 3rd party, but I often see it used as a scorn by dems... I doubt people would brag about it since it basically makes people react like you: "I don't hate you" proceeds to insult an imaginary justice warrior that is supposedly voting a 3rd party lol

All while the anime industry was booming in the west. It's funny how entertainment for young people is planned by old people. Then they get surprised when ghey flop

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough since I stated it at the end of the message instead of the beginning. I agree with basically everything you said, except using the ukranian war support as an example of the production capabilities of the EU industry.

Sorry if it came out as if I wanted to attack you on points you agreed upon, I just used you improperly as a way to post those points out more clearly for others to see.

It's not entirely correct to use the ukranian war as an example of EU industries not being able to supply enough: the US took the lead there an EU expected support to last so they didn't even make the effort. Most of our industries SELL abroad an ukraine was not needing our support since the US was supposed to cover for it.

Granted the industry is fragmented and not really cohesive, so it would lack in the quantity, but I was merely referring to quality as in we are able to create top of the line weapons and systems that are the best of the world (exluding stealth fighter jets).

If the EU focuses in one direction and stops selling all around... And seeing how it is being basically forced to do so.

This was more of an answer to the guys saying "EU just buys US weapons because those are the best!" Rather than a direct answer to you, but I'd rather answer to someone capable of reasoning...

In a non-binding post they said that. In the ToS they say otherwise. "Here, sign this contract, I assure you it doesn't do what it says" is how literal scams work. Laws aren't changing anywhere, they are

I love reading about people not knowing the EU military industry writing about how it's somehow weak. Newsflash: it's not. We don't talk or write about it 'cause it's sensitive data. We protect sensitive data. Our armies may not be strong, but our military industry is.

That was so high level it went past most of them. Take my upvote