c/PatientPatientGamingPosting
Sonotsugipaa
joined 2 years ago
Not always, if you fail the QTE you have to play through the bad ending
No, just base-256 numbers that for some reason people call "binary"
Beware, learning English words from me is a mistake
As one of the judges, I will obviously be jurying them
And some pedestrian
Not just edited files, edited save files if the headline is to be trusted
The one for appending files to the standard output, or the one for murdering unresponsive children?
I've got to work on the fact that seeing the word "insufferable" on social media makes me instinctively get defensive ._.
They do provide a free service (GTK's file chooser), one that I find horrible and inconsistent (as per the thread) and intentionally so (on issues tangential to example that I found, although the proposed configurable behavior would be nice) - so I won't even entertain the thought of trying and contributing to it, as it has been suggested.
I don't know what is insufferable about that, other than the initial criticism...
Enhancement? No, everything I have a problem with is explicitly intended behavior and GNOME devs are infamous for their everyone is stupid except me mentality
Edit, found a neat lil' example:
Does Gnome/GTK have an issue board where users vote on issues?
Free software development is not a democracy, and does not get driven by polls. Features and bugs are introduced by those who show up, within a community that works towards a shared goal.
I don't believe the intentional behavior is desirable and would like to see what other users think.
That's not how anything works.
Jokes on them, the Covenant have broken long ago