Hat jemand zufällig eine Liste der FDP Blockaden in letzter Zeit zur Hand? Ich verliere langsam den Überblick.
Sodis
joined 2 years ago
https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2022/12/PD22_511_124.html
Die Zahl der Menschen im Erwerbsalter von 20 bis 66 Jahren wird in den kommenden Jahren abnehmen. Aktuell gehören in Deutschland 51,4 Millionen Menschen dieser Altersgruppe an. Selbst bei hoher Nettozuwanderung würde es bis Mitte der 2030er Jahre zu einer leichten Abnahme um 1,6 Millionen Personen kommen. Bei niedriger Nettozuwanderung könnte die Zahl um 4,8 Millionen Personen sinken.
Sprich, alle Stellen sind betroffen, aber natürlich die mehr, wo jetzt schon ein eklatanter Mangel besteht, zB Lehrer und Pflegepersonal.
Das sind die bösen Ausländer, die restlichen 400k sind gute Ausländer.
Nicht zu vergessen, dass die Ämter nicht damit hinterher kommen werden Arbeitsplätze für Geflüchtete zu finden.
Über das Profilbild musste ich wirklich schmunzeln. Einfach Edgelord mit Ü40 sein.
Sie haben da schon einen Punkt, man könnte Anwohner an den Erlösen der Windräder beteiligen, dann würde es auch wesentlich weniger NIMBY Proteste geben.
I mean, it doesn't have to relate to a particle. Lambda is also associated with a property of space itself.
The point with the LHC is, that it is very hard to find something, that you are not actively looking for. You have to at least have a certain understanding of the decay channels of the proposed particle to be able to scan the data for it. It's the same problem they have for discovering dark matter particles.
Oh with mainstream science I meant the journalism, probably bad wording.
Yeah, but somehow mainstream science gaslit everyone into thinking, that the current model is definitely right, even though there are relevant observations, that are not explained by it. But I guess we just need a new even bigger particle accelerator and then we will definitely find dark matter particles!
It is not very reliable to use a component to build a model that has “no support from observations”.
But it has support from observations? It's an alternative explanation for the red shifts we observe from far away sources.
ΛCDM has also problems. For example that two different methods of calculating the Hubble constant do not agree, or that the James Webb telescope found galaxies, that are too old. The latter was the motivation for the paper and gives an explanation for it, contrary to current models.
Yeah, it is not generally a good idea to just throw in more components, like here a scalar.
Well, guess what the Λ in ΛCDM is? They just put it in there to be able to fit the theory to the observation. And it's absurd to say, that they would've found that in the LHC, when they also did not find dark matter particles, even though they are actively looking for those.
Does it still explain galaxy rotations? What about other cosmological data, like equation of state parameter and such?
They are aware of this and mention it already in the abstract:
It remains to be seen if the new model is consistent with the CMB power spectrum, the Big Bang nucleosynthesis of light elements, and other critical observations.
It's quite common for research groups to do this, because their work is quite complex and takes time. They proved that their approach might have some merit and now other groups can help them going forward with it.
Yeah, that's what I also never got. If you have dirt in the kitchen, that's semifluid, no one in their right mind would clean it without wetting it. But for the butt that does not count. I do not have a bidet, but I can reach the faucet from my toilet. So I just wet the toilet paper and produce far less toilet paper waste thanks to this.