Skates

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Hey man, you're kinda narrowing down the entire problem of the right to privacy being consistently shat upon by your government into "well I knew one person where it was justified so this means those who argue against it fuck kids"

I understand what you mean and if you want to carve an exception into the law for CP I'd be all for it - maybe everyone is a mandated reporter of child porn, and all suspicions MUST be reported to the FBI and the evidence handed over. But I don't wanna get swatted just because my wife and I are into BDSM and we photographed a particularly rough session. Or because I took some pics of some clear plastic bags filled with flour that I put in my trunk to prank a friend. Or a million other things a geek squad guy might misinterpret and call the police for.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

why women feel unsafe

How are you unsafe on the internet? Are you willingly giving out personal details to anyone messaging you? Is someone sending you DMs where they convince you to hit yourself? Or are you just worried about viruses?

you literally came at me with a attack calling me a schmuck

Ah yes, the constant fear of being called a schmuck. Frequently confused with the constant fear of actually being a schmuck, the main difference being that the former is image-related, while the latter usually implies some form of self-awareness. Also sometimes confused with the fear of an actual attack instead of just name-calling, by people who are so sure they're right that they can't spend the two seconds to search for statistics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotta claw back that moral high ground

I'm not sure where you think the moral high ground is, but there's nobody for me to claw it back from - or at least certainly not you. I'm amazed you've even heard of it, because you've obviously never seen it considering that I'm advocating for killing people who are leading an animal abuse group, while you're literally saying people are worthless because they're disabled.

I'm skipping the middle paragraphs but I'm gonna assume you realized you Freudian slipped your way into showing you're an ableist cunt, so now you're trying to prove you're not, or that I'm the bigger asshole, or some sort of last ditch attempt to make yourself sound reasonable. "Haha I'm not a dipshit I was trolling all along" style. As if anyone in their right mind is just going to skip past the fact that you're suggesting disabled people are worthless to society.

Oh shit sounds like I've made your "okay to shoot in the head" list.

You've gone through this entire conversation the wrong way, tbh. This is what happens when you try to put words in people's mouths to make your shitty arguments, you reveal your own thought process along the way. Let's go through it just to be clear: you obviously made the cunt list, because you're being an ableist cunt. But you seem to think the cunt list is the same as the "okay to shoot" list, and that's on you again. Because just like your previous "disabled people are worthless" opinion, it says more about you than me.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So - because even cops know that cops aren't trustworthy. Not even to other cops.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I just want to be absolutely clear

No you don't, you just want me to give you enough arguments to make your case. Which wouldn't be necessary if you had a case at all.

should we apply this same "your life is only tolerated if you're worth something to society" to, for example, the severely disabled?

It's interesting that you think disabled people are worth nothing to society. I guess you've never of Stephen Hawking, Stevie Wonder or Michael J. Fox? Or maybe you've heard of them, but think they've brought nothing to society? Or maybe you're aware of them and acknowledge their impact, but you still think you're better than them, just because they're disabled. Yeah, option 3 sounds like you. Cunt.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If this were a just world, this dude would be left in the gorilla enclosure to find himself at the mercy of a bigger mammal and get beaten to death. But life's not fair, so let's penny-pinch: is this guy worth anything to society? No. Will his continued existence (when he is allowed to be free again) be beneficial? No. Is his continued existence in prison more expensive than a bullet? Yes. So let's just pull the trigger and move on.

Sometimes you need to cut your losses. This one was fucked up. Take it out the back and dump it in the trash.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

My dude there's a few billion of you that I'm looking into, I don't have all day to listen to your half-assed "logic", I am eternal, I'm beyond your comprehension. Enjoy the rusted-spear-devil-dick, I'm Audi.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nope. I'm God. Please remember, you have as much evidence I am not, as I have that god doesn't exist.

And just for that "edgy teenager" comment, I'll put a word in to make sure you're tortured by the devil with the most jagged penis.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

neither science nor philosophy can provide objective truth in answer to the question "is there a god?"

That's a loaded question. What type of god? You wanna define it before you ask if it exists.

And after you define it, you can also gather all the proof that it exists and you can present it to science and to philosophy. And they will look at all that proof and say "X". Because they doubt.

But it's still on you to prove your claim that there is a god, if you believe it. If you're just on the sidelines asking because you're not sure - there's a simpler answer: yes, there is a god. It is me. And I need about 10% of your monthly income. Get in touch, I'll send you some details where you can donate your share. In return, I will of course love you unconditionally until you slightly annoy me with your lifestyle (which I already know you will, I am omniscient and I literally made you this way, you have no choice in the matter), at which point you will know my vengeance, for I am the Lord. Throughout this period where I exact my retribution, the expectation is that you'll shut up and take it, and never forget about that 10% you owe me. Otherwise I will literally put you through hell.

If you somehow doubt ANY of these claims, for reasons like "why would God contact me on the internet, or need my money, or hate me for how he made me", or any of these silly questions, just remember - neither science nor philosophy can provide objective truth in answer to the question "is there a god?". Just like they can't provide objective truth to "is god that dude on lemmy?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are you on about? Atheism is rejecting a ridiculous belief system. There is nothing for atheists to prove, they made no claims. Religion is the one making claims, so it's on them to prove it. Atheism simply says "no thanks, the evidence you provide is insufficient and I don't believe you".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

??

There is no "after fascists"? What the hell are you talking about? Are you aware Germany is currently one of the strongest economies, one of the top political players, one of the most influential countries we have today? They also have laws specifically prohibiting denying the holocaust and disseminating Nazi propaganda, because they learned and our . They learned their lesson with fascism and now are actively fighting against it, while being a great country to live in; This is after fascists. Sure, it wasn't the next fucking day. But it happened, which is more than can be said about the US.

So yeah, maybe sometimes the solution is to burn the country down and hope it rises from the ashes. If it does, it'll be stronger. If it doesn't, maybe it shouldn't.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course you could, but good luck letting Leo agree to that, he was even squeamish about the anal sex.

view more: ‹ prev next ›