Don't even bother with the post. I bet you can get through the clamps in less than a second with a 2 foot stepladder.
SheDiceToday
joined 2 years ago
Not quite. Judges and prosecutors typically have absolute immunity: https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/06/Keller-73-Stan.-L.-Rev.-1337.pdf
I lost the 'just enough' source for bags to pick up the dog's shit in.
I understand the criticisms of manjaro, and don't recommend it to people, but it seems to be the only distro to work with my hardware/software without issue. So for now, here I am.
It's a term used by one of the big economic thinkers associated with capitalism, or a version of it. It basically means the markets 'correct' themselves, merely by existing. It can be summed up as the collective actions of consumers and sellers setting prices for products/goods/services, rather than those same things being dictated by fiat.
So a fucking machine straight into his throat, eh? I think we can get behind that.
Bobby didn't have trauma. Becoming something your parents don't want you to be is normal adolescent -> young adult transition. When they maybe don't want you to be a dude hunted by the government and running around in sort-of fitting leather trying to stop or kill other people who are trying to kill you... just maybe that isn't trauma.
What's up with bottom-middle and bottom-left?
Pretty sure I can change all three in the right pardner. giggity
if you insult someone so that they punch you, it's your fault
That's not quite true. That's speech that you can be arrested for.
For use of force, or throwing a punch, here's the justifications for force in one of the states in which I've had to work with the law: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.9.htm#9.22 Look at 9.31(b)(1). It specifically says that force is not justified based on verbal provocation alone. It doesn't matter what they say. As long as the speech doesn't constitute a threat, then you cannot swing freely and claim self-defense as a legal defense.
Sovereign citizens aren't just being bad lawyers. They truly believe that the legal system is a world of magic where saying the exact right phrase will create nonsensical effects. The canadian judge that eviscerated their entire thinking did a really good job of showing how skewed their paradigm is.
I've never regretted that purchase.
Is that why the skinny tires became a thing? To make lowriders legal by getting the rim of the tire as close as possible?