Is it more prevalent in the renewables than in the oil and gas?
If not, maybe we should focus on the first in class before trying to cast the doubt on the best in class... Especially in the current state of the USA.
Colorado kids with leukemia are more than twice as likely to live near dense oil and gas development
Ducking mandatory vaccination! /s
C'est bon, on est sauvés! /s
The Neo-Nazis I know carry different flags. Not the one from the Bundesrepublik, which is too woke for them.
This was the case until 2006, though. Today, is really not like that anymore.
Anyone making so many they're/their mistakes must be highly regarded.
Y avait il des médecins venant de déserts médicaux a la manif? Si non, c'est un peu biaisé comme échantillonnage 🤣
@[email protected] writes:
It never says he supported trump or voted for him.
So I'm asking how he could have voted. Nothing else.
How could he have voted for Trump?
Oh! Hang in there, buddy.
It's not whataboutism. It's getting the priorities straight and not getting distracted by false problems.
What is raised in the article is not specific to renewables. It's pretty much generalized as soon as you have private interests.
So isolating renewables is improper and demagogic.