Haha brainfart. Thought about lan domains...
Scipitie
joined 2 years ago
Who should do this vetting though? The internet was built up with the idea of technical neutrality - everything else came on top. TLDs came later and were used to either describe the origin of a page or its intended(!) use. That leads to the case that not only can a propaganda outlet mark itself as "info" - it's actually historically correct to do so as it's about what the host wants to communicate.
ICANN, the organisation behind the TLDs, actually always struggles with this btw. A more recent example was the decision which domain should be reserved for local name services. It took y long time (I think years overall) to get to: .internal (edited, brainfart)
Would you mind telling the source of this? Looks intuitively right but... So do so many things :/
At home, in private lodgings and dedicated smoking areas.
This is one thing once more which would be a non issue if it weren't for the people who throw their stubs everywhere and blow smoke in the faces of others.
Hm I was clearly wrong, I apologize! The excuse is that I was really tired and already quite "clickbait state of mind" ish.
Thank you for taking the time to write this! ♥
Yes. And the "survivors" don't have a say in that if the person itself said otherwise before dying.
Training future doctors is a good cause and will most likely save lives in a similar fashion to donating a heart after all.
Edit: I removed a wrong part here claiming that the article is clickbait. I was off by a mile, see the reply to this post as to why.
Thanks! I know jack shit about this sport but find the simulation interesting.
Two things especially:
- the probability jump when each day is calculated (going actually backwards) and
- a 100% outcome prediction even for the 40/40 reached basically in the last two days.
These two in combination make me think that the model seems to be set for an optimistic pattern, is that a reasonable deduction?
Well those do grant a "mature content" rating. Insert "not like this" meme
Plus the brain probe tingling exactly the right spots!
Nah, you're doing the right thing: getting input when not sure. That's the way of learning!
Only one request: add the thoughts from this answer to the OP the next time please! Would make reading it a bit easier and better framed, at least for me.
(I.e. "I'm an authority in this field, look at this exciting news!" VS "my bullshit sensors tingle but I don't know enough. What are your thoughts?"
Oh sorry, nvidia RTX :) Thanks!
Nah, if you decode the lawful scale and the good scale to a number and go with 1 0 -1 for each then you reversed a -1/0 and that's obviously a 1/0. So you're lawful neutral!
I think?
Edit: tried to fix the scale names.