How is a list of seven(!) different analyzed potential factors reduced by you with a "wtf" to one of those?
And then followed by an anecdote, a correlated studies off topic to the study described and a bit of conspiracy theory (note: one of the few I even support myself, but i's out of scope of this article!).
You're actively harming the points you want to make by jumping onto the wrong targets.
Good point, that's a more transferable skill I haven't thought of!
Memory and comprehension are two different beats though. How could his amazing memory advance any area?
He knows every Spanish word but doesn't speak it, same for French.
It's an I missing something?
No one forces unattended updates. And containerd is already living in the userspace.
If every dev would live on a kernel level stability approach we'd will not have a containerd release at all.
Interested amateur disclaimer!
Fast rotating certificates always more secure because the timeframe between beach discovery and system inherent revoke is shorter.
How big the impact in terms of real life is I can't even guess because of the (from my perspective) weird circumstances they must happen to depend on the certificate lifetime itself.
I guess it's just one of these "every but helps" factors more than specific use cases.
Why would you change the 2023 ranking about that though? :p
Still not reflecting there but looking a bit better though: https://ratings.fide.com/
Oh I agree with that completely. The intelligence party is a marketing agent that works really well.
I only see (potential) use cases -I've yet to see them being efficient in the development context. :)
Honest attempt to changing your mind :)
Complexity rarely requires a lot of code but a lot of iterations. You don't know the specifics yet in detail.
That's actually one of the good parts of LLMs to quickly iterate on design and architecture in human language without having to write the code. After all we only want to decide left it right in the complex stage of development - doesn't have to necessarily be a smooth ride to figure that out.
Only once the specifics are clear you have to get the good stuff.
That said: it's still not yet there to really save time to the most of the seniors I've talked to -but it's the lack of reliability and not prompt complexity that I've heard as criteria.
The brain development is strongly linked to sleep patterns (mrt studies showed a correlation between bad sleep and learning activities in the brain).
There why you will have sleep regression patterns where it seems to get worse again. It'll also get better again!
I'm not aware of any studies supporting this conclusively. The biggest factor seems to be brain development which parents can't speed up at that age
This"sleep training" from the late 80s has a high chance of being seen in 20 years similar to whiskey against toothing pain from a decade earlier.
I can already here the people coming with "it worked for me!" and the utter lack of self awareness in that sentence.
Seems like a historic artefact to me as well. And one of their mentioned points was "no sync via http" which even for 2006 makes me... hesitant.
And their history section ends in 2007, couldn't find a feature comparison in their quick start guide.
Two come to mind but there will be a big caveat below: Either consumer protection: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32011L0083
Or more likely though the psd2 (I hope this one is the correct link, mobile...) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32015L2366
Now the big catch: you'd need to proof that you're dependent on that bank with no alternative, otherwise it's hard to argue that you are unfairly treated as it is up to reach company how to implement the psd2 securities requirements.
What happens if that you either agreed to their shorty app when signing up for a bank account or they changed their terms of service. If it's the latter than you need to agree to the changes or change your bank.
It would get more interesting if you need a specific app or device to close your account - here I'd be completely out of my depth but I would guess that it then depends on the specific national implementation.
Remember that EU law usually needs to be translated into national law for you to be applicable.
For your second question that is even worse news: that's for us as consumers to solve (depending a bit on the national implementation, at least in Germany companies and state are not anymore required to accept cash for invoices).
Edit: I answered only because you asked for the EU laws, I'm not at all familiar with the NL implementations and stumbled here from All :)