Scipitie

The flipper tries hard to stay "legal", respecting all kind of frequency limits - just like you need to use a different firmware for your wifi AP if you want to go beyond legal frequencies for your network.

Because the flipper doesn't run applications in the way q smartphone does. If you're a bit into hardware tinkering: Think of it more like an Arduino than a pi.

You won't get the AI stuff through. I'm working on a machine like you described and drilled a hole in it to provide power to a 3070 as the power supply wasn't beefy enough (and server power supplies are too expensive compared to a hole).

This is the first generation where I can play around with local LLMs from what I can tell - even used the hardware for that is way more expensive :(

Friend, there is only one kind of dumb question: those that are statements with a question marks at the end of are simply a vehicle to place a statement.

And even those are fine by me if the asking being realizes this within the discussion. ("Why are we allowing women to vote if they are that much dumber than men?" is a stupid question in my book - and even that can lead to "oh wow I always just assumed that to be true but (data/argument) made me realize that I was wrong!". Rare but can happen....)

Uns ergänzend für die nicht Klicker Ausschnitt aus dem letzten Absatz:

Rückwirkende Krankschreibungen sind nicht per se zweifelhaft, wenn sie medizinisch begründet sind. Hier stellten aber die Kombination der Umstände und die nicht nachvollziehbare Änderung des Gesundheitsbildes für das Gericht eine Erschütterung des Beweiswerts dar.

What you describe are feature requests not issues.

The reason you don't find them is simple: many projects don't want q myriad of form based user requests. Depending on the specific project it's either vote based or non existent in my experience.

AOSP as specific example is mainly maintained by Google who are notorious for being very ... Wet in their own ways on how to do feature roadmaps.

I think you're naked by both your life and that of the projects you want to support tougher by thinking about these things as issues. Just a rule of thumb m: it's an issue if it's not working as documented or behaving in a way that can be described in terms of "right" and "wrong", not preference.

Otherwise it's a feature request.

Your points for example are all aimed at quite advanced users. I'm not an AOSP dev but just looking at the way they developed their menus over TR years I'd be surprised if they'd share your evaluation.

Oh the trackers are against that because they fight all the way against people working against the community and I guess that they just see more leeches coming in this way.

Personally I don't care about the individual background as long as it's at least a break even in the community.

Good luck!

Just as a heads-up: expect some pushback just for asking.

In general buying accounts is frowned upon on all private trackers I'm aware of, including the rule to ban bought accounts on sight.

Several private trackers give out VIP status for people buying seed boxes through them though I guess there are some where you'd get an account in the first place through this.

It all depends on your goals. Personally I wouldn't trust account sellers. I don't see a way for them to get accounts without it being quite easily identifyable for the respective pages.

Personally I went the "hard" route but never tried to push into the cabal tier private trackers.

Just remember to not screw your account within the first hours by not taking care of your ratio and the trackers rules.

Bin ich bei dir, das ist sowas, was man mit statischer Regel praktisch nur falsch machen kann... :(

Vergiss bitte die Bauordnung nicht. Zwei Parkplätze und sechs Meter Abstand zur Straße müssen sein!

"Weil, das muss so"... Das war die Antwort aus meiner Frage "warum". Könnte ja Mal jemand kaufen, der zwei Autos hat...

Oh dann habe ich das wahrscheinlich auch verdreht, today I learned! Danke :)

Hey das OLG hat hier doch "richtig" geuereilt, sprich: in meinem Sinne gesagt, dass ABP keinen unlauteren Eingriff vornimmt.

Springer ist halt vors BGH gezogen und die haben "Formfehler", zurück auf null und so ...

Edit: der folgende Absatz ist falsch, das LG HH ist das mit den komischen Urteilen, nicht das OLG.

Was ich damit meine: ~~nur weil die anderen 99 Urteile von OLG HH nicht nachvollziehbarer Müll war und es einen Grund gibt, warum alles, was gegen Verbraucher geht in Hamburg eingeklagt wird ist das nicht in 100% der Fälle so.~~