Oh the trackers are against that because they fight all the way against people working against the community and I guess that they just see more leeches coming in this way.
Personally I don't care about the individual background as long as it's at least a break even in the community.
Good luck!
Just as a heads-up: expect some pushback just for asking.
In general buying accounts is frowned upon on all private trackers I'm aware of, including the rule to ban bought accounts on sight.
Several private trackers give out VIP status for people buying seed boxes through them though I guess there are some where you'd get an account in the first place through this.
It all depends on your goals. Personally I wouldn't trust account sellers. I don't see a way for them to get accounts without it being quite easily identifyable for the respective pages.
Personally I went the "hard" route but never tried to push into the cabal tier private trackers.
Just remember to not screw your account within the first hours by not taking care of your ratio and the trackers rules.
Bin ich bei dir, das ist sowas, was man mit statischer Regel praktisch nur falsch machen kann... :(
Vergiss bitte die Bauordnung nicht. Zwei Parkplätze und sechs Meter Abstand zur Straße müssen sein!
"Weil, das muss so"... Das war die Antwort aus meiner Frage "warum". Könnte ja Mal jemand kaufen, der zwei Autos hat...
Oh dann habe ich das wahrscheinlich auch verdreht, today I learned! Danke :)
Hey das OLG hat hier doch "richtig" geuereilt, sprich: in meinem Sinne gesagt, dass ABP keinen unlauteren Eingriff vornimmt.
Springer ist halt vors BGH gezogen und die haben "Formfehler", zurück auf null und so ...
Edit: der folgende Absatz ist falsch, das LG HH ist das mit den komischen Urteilen, nicht das OLG.
Was ich damit meine: ~~nur weil die anderen 99 Urteile von OLG HH nicht nachvollziehbarer Müll war und es einen Grund gibt, warum alles, was gegen Verbraucher geht in Hamburg eingeklagt wird ist das nicht in 100% der Fälle so.~~
Neither. What you don't seem to understand is neither how physically data gets stored nor how data rescue works.
On your very picture a magnetic disk is visible - that's where the storage is. You don't need the original case, head or even platine.
Now don't get me wrong please: I highly doubt that w complete reconstruction is feasible. Instead what I'm trying to convey is that the amount of data still on a trash heap that you transformed this disk into is for me utterly impressive.
No magnets, no acids - you're right in that this'll be hard - but from what the people told me who did a disc rescue for me once this would not yet be the worst thing they see.
The most interesting party for me is the about of tricks they need to do to reconstruct the data structure, ie where does one file and and the next one start. I'm hindsight an obvious issue but I never thought about that.
If your baseball got exactly the right spots the rescue would become at least easy now expensive :D
Nein. Wir sind mindestens zu zweit.
But this is an American outlet reporting on science..
"""
Earth's pole has drifted toward 64.16°E at a speed of 4.36 cm/yr during 1993–2010 due to groundwater depletion and resulting sea level rise
"""
That was two clicks away - so you're right: the property science wasn't some in fridges or football fields or any of the US scales.
Worked for me, hope the copy paste does as well
The LHCb experiment has observed a new difference between matter and antimatter in particles called baryons
By Clara Moskowitz edited by Lee Billings
Baryon particle illustration.
Thomas Parsons/Science Source
Matter and antimatter are like mirror opposites: they are the same in every respect except for their electric charge. Well, almost the same—very occasionally, matter and antimatter behave differently from each other, and when they do, physicists get very excited. Now scientists at the world’s largest particle collider have observed a new class of antimatter particles breaking down at a different rate than their matter counterparts. The discovery is a significant step in physicists’ quest to solve one of the biggest mysteries in the universe: why there is something rather than nothing.
The world around us is made of matter—the stars, planets, people and things that populate our cosmos are composed of atoms that contain only matter, and no antimatter. But it didn’t have to be this way. Our best theories suggest that when the universe was born it had equal amounts of matter and antimatter, and when the two made contact, they annihilated one another. For some reason, a small excess of matter survived and went on to create the physical world. Why? No one knows.
So physicists have been on the hunt for any sign of difference between matter and antimatter, known in the field as a violation of “charge conjugation–parity symmetry,” or CP violation, that could explain why some matter escaped destruction in the early universe.
Today physicists at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)’s LHCb experiment published a paper in the journal Nature announcing that they’ve measured CP violation for the first time in baryons—the class of particles that includes the protons and neutrons inside atoms. Baryons are all built from triplets of even smaller particles called quarks. Previous experiments dating back to 1964 had seen CP violation in meson particles, which unlike baryons are made of a quark-antiquark pair. In the new experiment, scientists observed that baryons made of an up quark, a down quark and one of their more exotic cousins called a beauty quark decay more often than baryons made of the antimatter versions of those same three quarks.
Magnet for the LHCb (large hadron collider beauty) particle detector at CERN (the European particle physics laboratory) near Geneva, Switzerland.
CERN/Science Source
“This is a milestone in the search for CP violation,” says Xueting Yang of Peking University, a member of the LHCb team that analyzed the data behind the measurement. “Since baryons are the building blocks of the everyday things around us, the first observation of CP violation in baryons opens a new window for us to search for hints of new physics.”
The LHCb experiment is the only machine in the world that can summon sufficient energies to make baryons containing beauty quarks. It does this by accelerating protons to nearly the speed of light, then smashing them together in about 200 million collisions every second. As the protons dissolve, the energy of the crash springs new particles into being.
“It is an amazing measurement,” says theoretical physicist Edward Witten of the Institute for Advanced Study, who was not involved in the experiment. "Baryons containing b [beauty] quarks are relatively hard to produce, and CP violation is very delicate and hard to study.”
The 69-foot-long, 6,000-ton LHCb experiment can track all the particles created during the collisions and the many different ways they can break down into smaller particles. “The detector is like a gigantic four-dimensional camera that is able to record the passage of all the particles through it,” says LHCb spokesperson and study co-author Vincenzo Vagnoni of the Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN). “With all this information, we can reconstruct precisely what happened in the initial collision and everything that came out and then decayed.”
The matter-antimatter difference scientists observed in this case is relatively small, and it fits within predictions of the Standard Model of particle physics—the reigning theory of the subatomic realm. This puny amount of CP violation, however, cannot account for the profound asymmetry between matter and antimatter we see throughout space.
“The measurement itself is a great achievement, but the result, to me, is not surprising,” says Jessica Turner, a theoretical physicist at Durham University in England, who was not involved in the research. “The observed CP violation seems to be in line with what has been measured before in the quark sector, and we know that is not enough to produce the observed baryon asymmetry.”
To understand how matter got the upper hand in the early universe, physicists must find new ways that matter and antimatter diverge, most likely via particles that have yet to be seen. “There should be a new class of particles that were present in the early universe, which exhibit a much larger amount of this behavior,” Vagnoni says. “We are trying to find little discrepancies between what we observe and what is predicted by the Standard Model. If we find a discrepancy, then we can pinpoint what is wrong.”
The researchers hope to discover more cracks in the Standard Model as the experiment keeps running. Eventually LHCb should collect about 30 times more data than was used for this analysis, which will allow physicists to search for CP violation in particle decays that are even rarer than the one observed here. So stay tuned for an answer to why anything exists at all.
What you describe are feature requests not issues.
The reason you don't find them is simple: many projects don't want q myriad of form based user requests. Depending on the specific project it's either vote based or non existent in my experience.
AOSP as specific example is mainly maintained by Google who are notorious for being very ... Wet in their own ways on how to do feature roadmaps.
I think you're naked by both your life and that of the projects you want to support tougher by thinking about these things as issues. Just a rule of thumb m: it's an issue if it's not working as documented or behaving in a way that can be described in terms of "right" and "wrong", not preference.
Otherwise it's a feature request.
Your points for example are all aimed at quite advanced users. I'm not an AOSP dev but just looking at the way they developed their menus over TR years I'd be surprised if they'd share your evaluation.