Sc00ter

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Do people think that? I remember seeing that the steelers wanted to retain both wilson and fields

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

You gain an extra level of deniability if you dont ask. Also its about how its received by the interviewee. If i ask how your summers going and you offer up you have 5 kids, thats different than me asking if you have kids. If i bring up your family situation or kids, the natural question arises, "why would he care about that?" And it can guide the mind to discrimination. People are aware of the fact that having kids have a preception in the corporate world, and if they dont want that to influence the process, theyre not going to offer it up. But just like anything, if someone wants to file a frivolous law suit, theyre going to find a way

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Not in HR, but am involved in the hiring process. We are not allowed to ask personal questions. Cant talk about family or personal background. If i ask a question about someones family and they tell me they have 5 kids, and they dont get the job because we found a better candidate, they have a clear and obvious path to file a discrimination case.

"I didnt get hired because they knew i had 5 kids and they assumed I wouldn't be able to dedicate time to the company yada yada."

" i told them that my religion was xyz and they knew my religious holidays dont align with their holiday schedule and they didnt hire me because they didnt want to make new policy to allow me my time and give me my protected right to religion"

Its just easier to not

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Which takes me back to my first point. Believing there is no god is not the same as "no religion." The survey has clearly delineated the two seeing as the atheist group is 3% and other surveys have shown "no religion/religious affilitation" to be as high as 30%

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think we are saying the same thing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Im currently usong boost with .ee, but i think support for that stopped too? Im going to have to change clients and instances

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

How about ChatCBD?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Youre right on the media. Veterans are tauted every opportunity they get, mean while theyre passing bills against transgender athletes that are literally impacting like 2 people. Where the media focuses is where people think the numbers are

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Not having a religion =/= atheist in surveys like this.

Believing there is no god is still a belief. Not having a religion means you dont subscribe to any belief

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

If youre mathematically inclined, think the correct door is +1 and the incorrect door is -1. The one who tells the truth is +1, and the one who lies is -1. When you look at them, all you see is absolute value of 1, and you dont know if its positive or negative. By asking the question to 1 of them about how the other would answer, youre now ensuring you have 1 truth and 1 lie. A +1 and a -1. Now your question is multiplying -1 and +1, and it doesnt matter if you +1 x -1 or -1 x +1 because transitive property, you always get -1... or the door that is incorrect.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Just fyi investorpedia is reliable. Ive personally never found incorrect information there.

Im not so sure id call schwab a conflict of interest exactly. They do provide the service, but financial institutions like that are not allowed to provide investing advice, so they cant upsell strategies like that. All they can do is explain it so that you know what strategy you want to pursue.

view more: ‹ prev next ›