Saurok

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Damn, guess we'll have to cut the "defense" budget, oh nooo. Maybe that'll encourage them to pass their audits.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The entire point of a protest is to disrupt and inconvenience people, including civilians. Protests have no teeth otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

You're probably telling them something they're already viscerally aware of.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, just saw this. The answer is at the expense of the global south. Those social democracies still have companies that profit off of the labor and resources of the global south.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You have to ask "At whose expense?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

You could always use native grasses and plants. There's nothing inherently wrong with grass, but it's important to have grasses that make sense within your ecological context. Using a bunch of non-native grasses may help for soil retention on your hill, but native grasses would do the same thing -- arguably better since you can use ones with root systems that grow deeper into the soil and they're more drought tolerant -- and they'd be multipurpose (food, cover, nest materials, etc.) for native animal species. They're often prettier and more colorful during the various seasons and take fewer resources to maintain once established.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 7 months ago

Based on the other things they're posting, I doubt it's sarcasm. This person wants harm to come to people who vote third party. If not, they can reply to this clarifying otherwise or edit their original comment and I'll happily stand corrected.

view more: ‹ prev next ›