SLfgb

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Totally. It's worth mentioning Germany in particular.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You put "declining" in quotes but haven't watched the video. I'd be interested in your take on Michael West's 14min analysis, rather than just of the title of the video.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Did you watch it?

(edit: typo)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Read Craig Murray on this:

Craig Murray: Something Changed in the Assange Case

Mentioning “what is at stake here” was the first real acknowledgement of the major issues in this case from the judiciary in over a decade of proceedings. It did feel like something had changed.

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/05/22/craig-murray-something-has-changed-in-assange-case/

Also, the Hill headline is slightly wrong. He can appeal the extradition. Not he can petition to appeal. Full appeal hearing coming up, not sure if the date's been decided on yet. He won the right to appeal on the grounds that he has a case that he will be discriminated for his nationality and denied first amendment protections as a non-US citizen. This comes after the US failed to provide satisfactory assurances that this won't happen.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Russia stole the Presidential election by hacking DNC and Podesta emails for WikiLeaks to publish so Russian asset reality tv star Donald Trump would win? But also it was Russian bots and memes that did the trick? LMAO.

In reality, Clinton stole the primaries from Bernie and made sure her opponent would be Trump who she believed would be a weak opponent, by getting her media mates to constantly talk about him. This 'pied-piper' strategy was a massive own-goal. So she blamed Russia for her own failures and of course everyone ran with it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

'Some liberals' - you mean all of blueanon? Democrats, Msnbc, cnn, etc.

It's unhinged because this sort of Russophobia may very well lead to WW3 and nuclear armageddon. Also because it has no basis in fact whatsoever. It's every bit as unhinged as the 'The Jews rule the world' one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

counter-question: Is it impossible to be private offline?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Qantas used to have a 'u' in it, but they changed their name so now you don't even know!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

who does this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, XMPP, a long-standing protocol that's also not a walled garden, doesn't require a phone number or even a phone. For android I use the Conversations client combined with Dino on computers. Currently logged in to a handful of devices synchronously. You can choose what server to make an account on; conversations.im I found to be reliable. Drawback is Signal doesn't let you bridge to it from anywhere outside of Signal. So I have accounts on both.

view more: ‹ prev next ›