SLfgb

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I'm just saying you're making a big deal out of nothing. Have a good night now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
  1. The Clinton emails were first released by the State Department under FOIA. (WikiLeaks were first to publish the different archives of the Podesta email leak and the DNC email leak.) Both WL and the Wall Street Journal each made the Clinton emails into a searchable database.
  2. WikiLeaks has never had to retract a single document or story.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

again, gender-neutral wording like they/them don't say anything about gender or her own identity. 'They' does not refer to a third gender. I'm not demanding anything from her. You're the one who brought up using the correct pronouns. So I expect you to be familiar with English grammar.

I think your language-policing is ridiculous. You can't expect someone unfamiliar with a situation to be up-to-date with how to affirm someone's gender correctly. Gender-neutral language functions as a safe fall-back in such situations. You can rightfully expect people to not misgender people. You cannot be rightfully offended at people using gender-neutral language. The only person I'm making demands of currently is you, because you're making this discussion unnecessarily hostile.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yea, they seem to have a pretty short fuse...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Also, how do you even know her preferred pronouns in English? Did you ask her?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

yea, nah.

Edit: Using a word is not the same as refusing to use another word in its place.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (9 children)

I'm sorry but no. Using gender-neutral language does not describe gender; using 'they' isn't to misgender, it just leaves the gender unspecified.

You can correctly use 'they' for anyone. If they'd said 'he', now that would've been different...

(Edit: typo)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'd rather be a loner than go back to that shitbook.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

You're right, it does not mean the mission of WikiLeaks changed. It clearly hasn't. They still have never had to retract a single document or story.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Totally. It is a complete farce.

 

More on this:

John Shipton: "Julian Assange can be freed with a phone call." Speech outside Prime Minister Albanese's Office, 09-12-2023 https://odysee.com/@Activism4Assange:6/John_Shipton_Speech_outside_PM_Albanese_Office_09-12-2023:a

‘Show some backbone’: call for Albanese to help release Julian Assange https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/news/show-some-backbone-call-for-albanese-to-help-release-julian-assange/news-story/48dfd3999dc90bad6b581df1c6d8c8fa

 
 

More on this:

John Shipton: “Julian Assange can be freed with a phone call.” Speech outside Prime Minister Albanese’s Office, 09-12-2023 https://odysee.com/@Activism4Assange:6/John_Shipton_Speech_outside_PM_Albanese_Office_09-12-2023:a

Albanese’s “Enough is Enough” Stance on Assange Is Pitiful. The People Demand More https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/albaneses-enough-is-enough-stance-on-assange-is-pitiful-the-people-demand-more/ https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/albaneses-enough-is-enough-stance-on-assange-is-pitiful-the-people-demand-more/

 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/7652184

John Shipton speaks outside Anthony Albanese's office on Saturday 9th December.

"Julian Assange can be freed with a phone call."

 

John Shipton speaks outside Anthony Albanese's office on Saturday 9th December.

"Julian Assange can be freed with a phone call."

45
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

17 Nov 2023

Afghan war crimes whistleblower David McBride has pleaded guilty today. The people who committed the crimes, and the officers who covered them up, remain without charge or investigation. Rex Patrick reports.

I guess pleading guilty was the right thing for an honest person to do. After you’ve been denied whistleblower protection, after you’ve been told your jury would not be allowed to see all the evidence, after you’ve been told your duty to your country and public interest do not trump obedience with the strict letter of the law, and with the Attorney-General content on letting you face the gallows, what are you left to do?

 

David's book is now available for purchase.

Please support his cause for justice by buying and reading his book; display it wherever you go.

20
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

On the street outside the courthouse immediately afterward, Davis told reporters: “We received the decision just this afternoon, which was in essence to remove evidence from the defense. … The Crown, the government, was given the authority to bundle up evidence and run out the backdoor with it. He is no longer able to put it before a jury.”

McBride said: “I stand tall and I believe I did my duty and I don’t see it as a defeat, I see it as a beginning of a better Australia.”

 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/6454045

Whistleblower David McBride has pleaded guilty to three charges after an ACT supreme court upheld a commonwealth intervention to withhold key evidence it deemed as having the potential to jeopardise “the security and defence of Australia” if released.

The former military lawyer’s team suffered a blow on Thursday after they lost a legal bid to overturn a ruling by Justice Mossop preventing McBride from arguing he was fulfilling his duty to the public interest in releasing the classified documents.

 

Whistleblower David McBride has pleaded guilty to three charges after an ACT supreme court upheld a commonwealth intervention to withhold key evidence it deemed as having the potential to jeopardise “the security and defence of Australia” if released.

The former military lawyer’s team suffered a blow on Thursday after they lost a legal bid to overturn a ruling by Justice Mossop preventing McBride from arguing he was fulfilling his duty to the public interest in releasing the classified documents.

 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/6447557

Here’s some more coverage of days 3 and 4 of the McBride trial:

Day 4:

Day 3:

The Afghan Files, abc News reports that McBride is the source of (2017):

view more: ‹ prev next ›