Comment was about as shallow as the article, so only fitting. It just listed same talkikg points, that are common in AI critique, didn't even present those particularly well, didn't bring anything new to the convo.
I would had been all in on reading actually decent in depth AI critique.
But this was just "top 10 talking points for AI haters we can hate together". I'm a AI hater but I don't want to read low quality junk media that just confirms my bias without nuance.
Weird hill to die on, gn.