Rooskie91

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol how is this a fair comparison? 10 mins of watching 4k vs 1 AI question does not seem equivalent at all. Like you could change the quantities and make the comparison look as bad as you want. Why not compare 1 min of 4k video vs asking AI 1,000 questions? Why not compare 1 hr of 4k video to 10 AI questions? When you're changing the variables around between comparisons like that then the comparison is worthless.

Besides that, the environmentally damaging part of AI isn't asking it questions, it's training the models themselves. Training AI uses huge resource consuming supercomputers and can take days.

[–] [email protected] 138 points 1 day ago (11 children)

"I may be Jewish, but at least I'm not a jezebel"

Now that's a sentence with some baggage.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Excedrin is one of the more popular brand names. They're specifically advertised for headaches.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is a similar to energy saying “all lives matter” when someone says “Black Lives Matter.”

Your argument falls apart when you remember that “women” aren’t some isolated, homogenous block. Women are investors, lenders, vendors, employees, political associates, foreign leaders, clients, etc. They exist in every single demographic you claim we should be paying more attention to. Erasing “women” from the conversation doesn’t make your assessment broader. It erases the reality that women are part of every single group you’re describing, and Trump has assaulted multiple members of those groups.

Also, if we did remove women from the equation entirely, Trump has still exploited people from every imaginable class, nationality, and background. The problem isn’t that he’s being judged “only” through the lens of women, it’s that you’re suggesting women’s perspectives are somehow less valid when they’re the ones disproportionately targeted and disbelieved.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

"How whiteness makes you gay"

[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I propose that anyone defending themselves in court over AI stealing data must be represented exclusively by AI.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

It's not the best system, it's the most addictive.

 

IDK why, but this idea helps me sleep at night.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Women have already come forward and had their lives destroyed. If the general public believed them during their trials, or honestly, if they weren't intimidated into dropping their case, this shit would already be in prison.

But the testimony of women is valued less by the justice system than the testimony of rich powerful men. That's the problem. There is less trust in women overall, across the board in this patriarchal society.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

Actually, most of us can tell the difference between a committed sex trafficker and the actual sex slaves she helped traffic.

If this does get said in her defense, it will be bad faith, and the only people that repeat it will be MAGA loyalists.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Yeah but when victims do expose themselves, it'd be nice if a bunch of online shit heads didn't constantly chant 'women are liars! They only want money!"

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nice ad homin, I'm definitely going to take your opinion seriously now!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Oh, I tried this on shower thoughts. Get ready to read some depressing comments.

view more: next ›