Risk

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why did I read the title as 'explosive if eaten raw'?

So I've figured if I just cook the dynamite, then it's safe to eat.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I blame my parents almost always providing desert after dinner for my entire childhood.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Good luck for the op buddy!

Drinking less is probably good for you anyhow ha.

Having a wife with ADHD is really good for DIY.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Rock goes boom.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Mascara on a cat is unsettling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Regarding Vanguard - how will it tie in to EVE? Will Vanguard players be able to sell stuff to EVE players for currency?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

War is an excellent distraction for the masses.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Whilst I agree with you in that I don't think this is an optimal approach, at the same time I'm curious as to whether this would create a significant black market for cigarettes.

Anybody already addicted will continue to have access. Anyone not addicted has to overcome the barrier of acquiring it illicitly, which works in tandem with education about the harm it does.

Considering how bulky cigarettes are compared to most other drugs, I wonder whether most dealers would carry around loads of cigarettes - particularly if they'd be at risk of being prosecuted for having them (which I don't think is the case here, though).

However, it would probably increase the rate at which weed is cut with tobacco as it increases the addictiveness and ensures customer dependency for the dealers.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Who are carbon taxes unpopular with? Aside from politicians?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Weird, I thought it was hunter2.

view more: ‹ prev next ›