Um, no, not really.
It's the Torygraph, you're not missing much.
See, I thought both of your positions were somewhat reasonable and I think it's a shame you blocked someone for disagreeing with you.
Remember, if it doesn't come from within an atomic orbital it's not an electron, it's just sparkling beta radiation.
The studies where it 'improves' hygiene are poorly designed as they don't control for education and understanding.
In other words - what's better: teaching our baby boys the simple act of cleaning under their foreskin in the bath, along with the rest of their body or cutting off a sensitive and important part of their body to make masturbation and sex more difficult?
Huh? I don't follow.
That's bananas.
Times of Israel citing an IDF official as 2:1 civilians:combatants - bearing in mind any >15 year old male will be classed as a combatant too, even if they're civilian.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_War - 1:2.5 civilians:combatants of Pacific theatre, if Wikipedia is enough for you.
Still don't like it.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-messenger-bias-and-credibility/
Has it at 'mixed credibility'.
Is this story for any reason significantly different from Russian State TV sabre-rattling designed to placate and enthuse a Russian audience?
Should have been "Hi Pregnant, I'm...Dad?" though...