Can we stop repeating clickbait titles from cancer tech magazines? If you post, then why not just give us the gist of the article? For instance here: what’s the feature, and why is it a concern that one might „fall in love“ with it?
Retiring
joined 2 years ago
It’s called sponsorblock, and there is no machine learning involved whatsoever. The data is crowdsourced.
Anyone else read that as „morphine spray-on gel…“?
They have an iPhone, so they are going to be fine.
I have no collection whatsoever. Everything that I watched gets deleted from the seedbox. A maximum of 900GB are stored on there at any given time. It’s cheap and no hassle to maintain.
When trying to connect, try omitting the / at the end of the address. Maybe thats the problem. So instead of
https://my.jellyfin.server/
You type
https://my.jellyfin.server
Shouldn’t make a difference, but sometimes it does.
Of course they are cheaper, thats why they put them everywhere instead of regular buttons.
Yes it is. But your comment still doesn’t make sense until you add “per year”.
WattHours is a unit of work. If you say that bitcoin uses x amount of Wh it doesn’t say shit about how much it actually consumes. Because you don’t say in what amount of time Bitcoin uses said amount of work, you cannot compare it. I could state, that Bitcoin uses 5 Wh. Which would also be correct.
Its the same as saying, Bob eats 5 apples. Alice eats 2000 apples. Can you compare the two? No, because what I forgot to mention is, that Bon eats 5 apples a week and Alice eats 2000 apples in 3 years. Now i can compare the two.
Do you get my point?
This seems like something you don’t want to use on a road with cars. Otherwise it looks neat!