ResoluteCatnap

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

You literally asked if they were that bad at logic while offering no actual refute to what they had to say. But whatever, have a nice day

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Now class, over here is a blatant example of the ad hominem fallacy

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

It's an ai roleplay app of some sort. The user (pink text) instructed it to say hello world in html and the ai did it. Showing the app vulnerable to prompt injections since it didn't do any kind of validation before sending the request to chatgpt/similar and then returning the response.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not preferred pronouns. Just pronouns

Please note that the trans community no longer uses the phrase “preferred pronouns” as it implies that trans people’s pronouns are a preference, not a fact.

https://glaad.org/reference/transgender

Op, glaad and hrc both have great resources to dig into

https://www.hrc.org/our-work/parents-for-transgender-equality-network (see supporting your trans children page)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I heard Mormons are also known as LSD cuz they use so much. Amish going to wipe the floor with them.

Also the Amish have horses

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I cannot abide bestiality-adjacent people who have a disproportionally high number of groomers in their community.

Citation needed. Tbh this sounds like a fascinating dataset but I'm skeptical it even exists.

[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Little more info

Reportedly 2gb of data

The data includes the “full names, email addresses, passwords, and usernames” of people associating with Heritage, vio said, including users with U.S. government email addresses. “This itself can have an impact to heritage’s (sic) reputation,” they added, “and it’ll especially push away users in positions of power.”

(And thank you gay furry hackers 🫡)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Pc only but I'm in no rush. They always come down eventually 😅 plus my free time is limited atm anyway so it's not a huge deal waiting for a better deal

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Soulslike games are personal challenges. So whatever makes sense to you. but default if it is in the game then it's fair game. If you want to do a run where you don't use summons or limit yourself in some other way then that's cool too. I like doing SL1 challenges. I'm terrible at it but it is fun to see how much i improve

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's too expensive for me atm, but I'm also a patient gamer so i don't mind waiting a few more years to see it get down even more. I didn't think the current sale price was unreasonable compared to what i expected it to be. Just more than I'm willing to pay

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

lol… who the hell thought anti-fa were behind Jan6?

Try Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz @ 1:16:00

If I recall correctly the insinuation made about this far-right group was on Joe Rogan podcast. This is the only thing I can find that goes into some details regarding the conspiracy theory about the group.

Theres this concept of asymmetry of proof which makes it more difficult to disprove something (especially a broad claim) than it is to prove it. I suspect that's why you've been getting downvoted because it takes little effort to say "aren't they actually fbi?" then to go through and find evidence indicating otherwise. This is why the burden generally is to prove something, not disprove something. In this case Joe Rogan/whomever makes up shit and it is his/their responsibility to prove it. Just because someone says something doesn't make it true. For instance if I said unicorns are actually real and are invisible aliens from Jupiter's invisible moon then that is something very easy for me to claim, and would be impossible for someone to definitively disprove. Whereas you could instead ask me to definitively prove it and I should have some reasonable argument for why this exists (with hard evidence to support it) . Fortunately in this case there does seem to be other sources that also dig into these false claims of the Patriot Front. And again, the burden of proof still lies with whomever actually proving these claims rather than other sources disproving them.

view more: ‹ prev next ›