Rapidcreek

Sigh. The reason that you cull is a transmittable disease is present within a group of livestock. That livestock can not be eaten, so you take it out of the food supply before it infects other groups. Not so hard to understand is it?

Citizen Kane is recognized for many different reasons, and that's one. But, in essence, the story is the film. Wells masterpiece was the result of a feud he had with William Randolph Hearst, so he brought him down on film. Wells also had the strange habit of divorcing wives and killing them off in one of his movies.

Culling isn't humane. Culling is a necessity. Farmers and ranchers don't like to cull, they lose money doing it. You give them a cleaner and cheaper way to do it, and they'll do that. Culling prevents disease from spreading into the entire food system. Sitting on your couch and deciding the best tactic to do it is ridiculous.

They are autonomous to a point, but every tribe gets federal funds. It is usually focused on quality of life issues like health, nutrition and that sort of thing. Reservations are, with some exceptions, very poor and don't have tax bases. Back in the day, they were given crap land which is the main reason.

Cutting off the heads of a thousand diseased chickens would take a bit of time, don't you think?

Some say Orson Wells Citizen Kane is the best movie ever made. We love to see the mighty fall.

Oh, so nobody pointed out your nonsense before? Interesting.

All those countries know they too would go to war. They criticize tactics, but few besides the US come up with any alternatives, so their criticisms are flaccid. Then there are the middle eastern countries, with the exception of Saudi and Jordan, who said immediately after the butchery of October 7th that Israel deserved it.

I lived around Lakota Sioux as a kid. Spent a year in one month in Pine Ridge. Had a roommate in college that was Lakota from the Ridge. From what little I know, it's a terrible place.

You can't quite get a logic line between the two paragraphs, but nice try.