PseudoSpock

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] PseudoSpock 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was a choice made by wayland devs not too use what was available. Their fault.

[–] PseudoSpock -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wayland could have been written to support NVidia, just as X11 does. They chose not to because they hate the driver being proprietary. Wayland had the option to be and do a lot of things that the devs refused.

[–] PseudoSpock -5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

PLEASE stop spreading that lie!!!

[–] PseudoSpock 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, never vote for anyone who votes for the ban.

[–] PseudoSpock 3 points 2 years ago

You mean, besides being chromeos? ;)

[–] PseudoSpock 2 points 2 years ago

And Mint because Gnome (shudder)

[–] PseudoSpock 4 points 2 years ago

This wasn't just ignorance, this was willful ignorance.

[–] PseudoSpock 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I suggest a filesystem that supports taking snapshots in the future. It's a lifesaver for moments like these.

[–] PseudoSpock 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

When distros make it the default DE, that's forcing it on them. No different then Microsoft bundling a specific browser. I also disagree that it works well on desktops. It lacks features, and tweaking it to resemble and behave like a more common desktop design is cumbersome.

[–] PseudoSpock 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Gnome. It's made for touchscreens, but forced on desktop users.

view more: ‹ prev next ›