The 60 days of employment is a requirement of the WARN act (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_Adjustment_and_Retraining_Notification_Act_of_1988)
When employees are laid off at Google, they lose access to any systems, can't contact co-workers in the usual manner, etc.
Google severance has been increasing worse since they had their first 12,000 employees get laid off.
I remember using something like this - they can hook up to a barcode scanner you wear on your finger
You had to strap them really tight on your arm, if you didn't the weight of the device would make it rotate around and have the screen point away from you
That is the intent of RTO policies, yes. It's a lot cheaper to compel workers to quit rather than fire them.
They should give her a medal
"Let businesses decide how much parking they need, instead of big government"
Doesn't seem very tricky to me. Businesses can invest less into infrastructure that isn't used that just absorbs solar radiation all day, and build larger businesses, or purchase less land, so that it can be more efficiently used.
https://www.masimopersonalhealth.com/products/masimo-w1
Looks like they've been selling this since November 9th 2022 at the latest.
"The city of Chicago is openly proclaiming itself as a bike-friendly city. Is that an indication of the city's intent?" Justice Liz Rochford asked a lawyer for the city.
"No, your honor," replied Stephen Collins, Chicago's assistant corporation counsel.
Any lie necessary to avoid reasonable infrastructure. Especially with bicycles banned on the sidewalk.
Stop stealing all the taxpayer money, and provide the bare fucking minimums.
Hey, I resemble that remark!
This is super strange. Has it been like this their entire life?
You clearly care a lot, about this so just throwing out ideas:
Have you tried using a dog bowl? Offering food outside/on a walk? Maybe eating a bit of the food yourself in front of your dog?
"Developers still can't include language about going directly to their websites for a discounted rate"
"However, the rulings establised that Apple's so-called "anti-steering" rules—language prohibiting developers from mentioning cheaper or alternative purchasing options that might be available outside of an app—were anticompetitive."
Well, I guess it's time to sue again since Apple is refusing to respect the court ruling.