PizzaMane

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

To which the meaning of that, given the context, is "being a police state, arresting every one at the drop of a hat will not solve things, preventative measures will always be more effective at reducing crime."

But that's evidently too much context to understand, and strawmen args are more to speed for republicans.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Nah, it was pragmatic. She was losing crew that couldn't really be replaced. And she was on the verge of losing a very important crew member, Tuvok.

She wasn't about to let that happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

You just told me no child in the U.S. goes hungry. So I don't buy this act you're putting on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

What a comeback

Yawn

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

No, I think it's fucking grotesque how much yall fetishize starving children.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Didn't say it did.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (9 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So why did you say it is my job?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Quit trying to put words in my mouth.

I don't have children, I'm not in poverty. I have not caused others to be in poverty. So how is it my obligation to solve U.S. poverty instead of the governments?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

So why is it my obligation to address poverty instead of the governments?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (8 children)

It’s your job.

Why?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (12 children)

I think the government failing to address poverty is a form of hate for the poor. But good attempt to put words in my mouth.

view more: ‹ prev next ›