Pietson

If the answer is yes, then it simply will never take over. As long as we have some sort of law that requires art to be tagged as AI if it’s AI generated, then I think that would be enough. No need to tag original (human) art with anything, no need for that kind of surveillance, just tag AI art or make companies legally required to divulge if it is so.

I find it hard to imagine that such a law would ever be implemented, even harder to imagine it would be enforced well, and even if both of those happen, that companies wouldn't find ways around it like just oversaturating everything with "may contain AI generated imagery" so that the tag becomes entirely meaningless.

adding a mandatory label doesn't really feel like a good solution to me.

Same, don't really see the point of filling my sub feed with something I dislike.

I've made a shortcut in Firefox to add the kbin mobile site to my home screen and it is essentially indistinguishable from a mobile app like this.

Also if it is real, surely they can just prove it by sharing where the picture is taken?

Edit: apparently it was taken at a Gucci exhibition. Surely that's enough info to double check?

yogscast is another example. Some creeps in the network got exposed, they put out a public statement but they did not remove any previous content with those people in it.

If the kid can't enter into the contract surely the phone wouldn't belong to them though?

if you read the article it's just some joke tweets that bbc decided to make up a misleading title about.

that's by ELO

Knights of Cydonia

Yes! the hobbit book was the first so you can hardly call the movie a prequel. They just made the sequels first.

Very cool. Does it work with the default colour changing options?

you say that but I smashed the screen on my pixel 4a a few months back, had a quick look around at what new devices I could get in it's price range, and the 4a was still the device that met my needs best.