NoSuchAgency

Sorry, didn't realize you couldn't read

Don't know what to tell you. It's his own words so if you'd rather it be someone else speaking for him then go for it

A lot of places

Here, just read Brad Smiths own words and you'll see why the defense didn't call him. The judge wouldn't let him explain the law...he would only let him give a general definition.....https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/key-trump-witness-nixed-after-merchans-stringent-rulings-reveals-what-his-testimony-would-have-been/ar-BB1mNALM

"I direct you back to page three of my decision," Merchan said, reiterating that Brad Smith could testify as to what the FEC is, its purpose, background, what laws if any FEC is responsible for enforcing and general definitions and terms that relate to this case, including contribution and expenditure. So he was only allowed to testify the definition, purpose, and backround of the FEC which would be pointless really.

Yeah, you mean the classified documents Biden took as a Senator and sold them to his book writer?

I read the instructions, so I guess the judge in this case

Wow...just sounds like more corruption in the DOJ. Not surprised though

And how is that?

No, they run on stopping actual crime, not going after a particular person