Nagarjuna

joined 5 years ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

I've heard managers complaining about shit like "every week this lady comes in and steals half the baby section and I'm not allowed to do anything!"

Like, dude, listen to yourself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

People love to say that southern things are black things. It's only a matter of time before watching quilting shows, eating at waffle house and living in Dekalb County are appropriative.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

The take on hobby shops is much higher

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

X-Men was woke in a genre known for being woke. Superheros have always had references to Jewish folklore and characters meant to stand in for immigrants.

But sci-fi? Don't get me fucking started on Heinlein and Bradbury. 60s TV? Even worse. But that didn't stop Roddenberry from coming out the gate swinging with a Russian main character and an interracial kiss.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Arcata meets LA

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I mean, when you're as great as you are, it would be weird if you weren't in love with yourself

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Is a clopen relationship one where you go on a dinner date and a breakfast date back to back?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Is the Teamsters staff organizer nice?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

let me piss here

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Man I'm still gonna be a mess at 80 aren't I

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

If you publish it anonymously from a VPN I'm pretty sure they could only easily go after the archive

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

Oh yeah, I probably should comment first thing in the morning after a night of smoking huh

 

Yet again the social democrat pivots right once in government. Crazy how this keeps happening. It's almost like we need revolutionary change which electoral institutions cannot offer, even when staffed by committed abolitionists.

 

Post the links in the comments so folks can explore them and give their own input!

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

There's been discussion of federation with Lemmygrad. I think this is probably a good call. I just want to know how the anti-sectarian rule would be enforced. Like, it someone makes an anti-anarchist post on lemmygrad.ml and it shows up on hexbear.net, would the moderators hide the comment on our end but not on Lemmygrad? Would repeat offenders be banned from hexbear.net even though they made the comment on a different iteration?

Same for one of the bigger anarchist instances like lemmy.blahaj.zone which has good leftist and trans content but also has regular struggle sessions about "tankies." It seems like federation with then would be a boon for both sites, but moderating the left unity rule would be a nightmare.

Also, another thought: would downbears from other instances carry over here?

 

Malatesta is the anarchist who most clearly differentiates anarchists from marxists, while recognizing what works: specifically anarchist orgs, participation in unions, working-class self defense. He invented modern anti fascism. Guy doesn't get enough credit.

Anyways, in this one, he calls for anarchist participation in the trade union movement as anarchists. He argues that while unions are a prerequisite for revolution, they are an insufficient organ for it.

While the Italian anarchist revolutions in the 30s and 50s ultimately failed, they came closer than revolutions in anywhere in post-war Europe besides France and Spain, and should be recognized as an essential part of our revolutionary heritage. Who's to say if the Partisan movement would have been a quarter as strong without them.

 

Nobody wants to work anymore, but Oregon's willing to do something about it.

God bless the Soviet State of Oregon

 

1) There's two things that work: Direct Action and pressure campaigns.

in a pressure campaign, you've got to figure out who's got decision making power and target them specifically. It can be a politician who's a swing vote, a boss who's refusing to recognize a union, the bargaining team for the police officers guild, or a landlord who's refusing repairs.

Figure out your leverage. Workers have leverage in that they provide labor. tennants have leverage in providing rent. voters provide votes. There's other kinds of pressure too, for example, landlords often care about impressing neighbors, coworkers, charitable organization board members, and fellow congregants. Universities need to retain students. But! you might not have leverage over every target! A massive chain's shareholders might be able to eat the impact of a strike, but a local manager might lose his job because of it. In that case, your leverage is over him, not the shareholders.

Every action should be part of an escalation campaign. In other words, start small (petitions, buttons, pins, etc.), build up bigger, maybe to flyering. Then work up to pickets. After that, protests, after that, vandalism and blockades, etc. This way, the longer things go on, the worse it gets for your target. They can make it all stop by giving a raise, or doing repairs, or freezing the rents, or ceasing construction. It is not enough to just protest!

In direct action, you make what you want happen yourself. Churches hate hunger, so they organize food banks; food banks are now the most effective form of welfare in america. Animal rights activists hate mink farming, so they sabotage the farms; the PNW fur industry is now a 10th the size it was in the 80s. Puerto Ricans were being denied aid after a hurricane, so they snuck into the aid warehouses and delivered it themselves. The IWW hated having bosses, so they elected their own and refused to recognize the company's. Revolution is direct action on a mass scale

2) Don't be a weirdo! The other day, a Maoist came up to me in a red scarf and started asking me questions about my struggles as a worker. The maoist asthetic is off-putting and corny. Acting like you're a third party outside of the working class is cringe. You're a worker, I'm a worker. If you want to find out about my struggles, gripe about work with me. Calling it social investigation makes you think of yourself as a detective. You're not a detective, you're my pal getting drinks after work.

DSA grew so fast because they called themselves "democratic socialists." That's just optics. A lot of DSA work is the same as ML party work: strike support, salting, socialist education, mutual aid, shooting practice. But they got more members because they used words and asthetics americans are comfortable with. Ditch the red scarf and the hammer and sickle and the fealty to Mao. It doesn't mean don't read and apply Mao, it just means be normal.

3) you've got to be engaged in struggles in your own life. You can't just ask other people to have a revolution for you. In the 70s, socialist parties had their members all take jobs in the same factories and organize fighting unions in them. Your party can go into warehouses, hospitals, meatpacking plants, even universities! Anywhere there's thousands of workers. The IWW helps general membership organize each others workplaces. Salting or organizing where you stand doesn't matter. What matters is that you're helping each other to organize in your own lives. you can do the same thing living in the same apartment building or forming a solidarity network to fight for each others stolen deposits. You can even go to the same church!

Protests ask other people to act. Organizing in your own life prepares you and your community to act. If you're raising awareness about imperialism, you're asking other people to act. On the other hand, if you organize with the diaspora, in their apartments, in their workplaces, in their churches, you're creating the capacity to overthrow their oppressors with them.

4) You can't win without people

Militancy is good, but you've got to warm most people up to it. You do this through one on one conversations or by fighting and winning to demonstrate it can be done (and then through more one on ones).

If you're not sure if you can pull off a big action, do a structure test! You can test individuals by asking them to do something like "get so and so to sign a petition." You can structure test coworkers through petitions, getting people to wear pins or holding a mock strike vote. You can structure test neighborhoods by going door to door asking people to sign pledge cards or give you their contact info.

If your structure test fails, it's time to do more one on ones. If you act with a small group, you'll get retaliated against. There's safety in numbers, so build numbers.

what might this look like? A few hypotheticals:

Stop cop city:

What if local groups ran escalation campaigns against local offices of contractors and funders associated with the project? What happens to the project when investment managers at local banks are subjected to pressure campaigns? When regional directors of building contractors are as well? How about when shareholders start getting phone zapped?

Defund the Police:

What if the next time the cops were bargaining a contract with the city and putting up resistance to reform, we mounted pressure on their bargaining team? How dedicated to qualified immunity would their bargainers be when there's a pressure campaign on the landlords and their pastors? What if we were in power in the unions and could threaten to kick the police out of the labor council if they weren't open to reforms?

Covid 19:

What if our response to Covid had been to organize for sick time and ventilation upgrades in our workplaces? If we were in warehouses and could win those reforms in a 5000 person workplace, that would have a huge impact on viral spread.

In short: Stop protesting, start organizing.

 

Like, that's what dedicated anti-imperialist organizing looks like. Like, if any of you folks in modern anti-imperialist orgs are doing this right now, my hat's off to you. This kind of bravery is really incredible.

Socialist Workers Party continued to send in members, and at Fort Jackson in 1969 was able to create an organization called GIs United. This group contained a number of very capable organizers, and in March they succeeded in holding a large open meeting on base to rap about the war and racism. Over 100 GIs participated in this free-floating rap session, and the brass moved swiftly to bring the organizers up on charges.

As well, there's evidence of less well documented organizing:

During the summer of 1968 troops were put on alert for possible use at the Democratic convention in Chicago, and 43 Black GIs at Fort Hood held an all-night demonstration declaring their intention to refuse any such orders. This was a harbinger of continued discontent among black soldiers. During the summer of 1969 black GIs in the 3rd Cavalry Division at Fort Lewis walked out of riot control classes en masse, and the brass were so anxious to avoid an incident that they let it pass.

all in all, resistance from within the military during the Vetinam war was incredible:

By 1969 entire units were refusing orders. Company A of the 21st Infantry Division and units of the 1st Air Cavalry Division refused to move into battle. By 1970 there were 35 separate combat refusals in the Air Cavalry Division alone. At the same time, physical attacks on officers, known as "fraggings", became widespread, 126 incidents in 1969 and 271 in 1970. ... From January of '67 to January of '72 a total of 354,112 GIs left their posts without permission, and at the time of the signing of the peace accords 98,324 were still missing.

The Vietnam war wasn't ended by protests, it was ended by organizing and insurrection from within the ranks and fierce resistance by the NLF.

:amerikkka:

 

In this thread, share your favorite books on praxis: Guides on how to organize rather than guides on what to organize against.

Protest and blockades:

Earth First Direct Action Manual How to run blockades, organize protests, do tree sits, etc. Great for environmental actions, but applicable to other campaigns as well.

Recipes for Disaster An anarchist how-to on protests, sabotage, dumpster diving, non-monogamy and more. Like the edgiest table at a zine fair in a single book

Labor and Tenant organizing:

Secrets of a Successful Organizer A how to on organizing written by Labor Notes, a militant, pro-democracy conference and newspaper for the American Labor Movement.

Building a Solidarity Network A SolNet or SolFed is like a worker center, but entirely volunteer run and focused on direct action. Example

EWOC organizing guide this is a collab of the DSA and United Electrical, which is one of two remaining "red" unions from the original CIO (the other being the ILWU).

Running Meetings:

Rusty's Rules of Order: How to Hold a Good Meeting

How to Bottomline

Guide to Consensus Decision Making

 

So there was a recent post of some right wingers standing next to a ballot box to intimidate voters. This is clearly bad. They also made questionable aesthetic choices, like wearing dad cargo-shorts and growing goatees. This is also clearly bad.

So, what did Chapeau.Chat focus on? The weight of these men of course!

Let's start with the basics:

--Everyone has a range of weights their body is comfortable at. If you try to go too low or too high in this range, your body will start sending your hunger and satiety signals to keep you within that range. While you can go higher or lower in that range by manipulating Calories-in-calories-out, this range is fairly fixed without medical intervention. In other words, some people are just fat.

--There are other uncontrollable factors that effect weight. In Texas, for example, there are fewer walk-able neighborhoods and more access to fast food than here in Portland where there are more new-seasons than mcDonalds or Manhattan where it's easier to take the train than to drive.

--Socially, weight is co-constructed with fitness and self-control. In the protestant value system (the dominant one in the U.S. even among atheists), self control is one of the most important virtues. Fat implies unfit implies poor self control. Thin implies fit implies good self control.

Protestant morality is, here, at odds with reality. Weight here is co-produced by environment, hormones, eating habits and movement habits. All of those things are only partially under our control, and a Portlander is always going to have an easier time being thin than an Austintonian. Moralizing weight the way this community did celebrates protestant morality over basic reality.

As communists, we are better than that.

Call them fascists, make fun of their ugly beards, offer to shoplift them better shorts, but don't fat-shame them.

 

A barricade closes the street, but it opens the way --French proverb

Look Chapos, I'm dead serious.

fake general strikes like this one do nothing.

--They Work. The airport protests that blockaded the gates delayed the Muslim bans by months. The barricades erected by students in Mai '68 were quickly followed by a general strike. The barricades put on train tracks by Indigenous people in so-called "canada" stopped the police incursion in Wet'suwet'en territory. The Oka crisis barricades stopped the construction of a golf course on Mohawk land.

--Labor doesn't start general strikes, social movements do. Fredy Perlman once observed that Mai '68 was not the product of communist parties or labor unions, but "a handful of madmen". The general strike of '68 didn't start with the unions but with students barricading the streets. It was only when the students mobilized that the unions followed.

--They do the same kind of economic damage that strikes do All construction is done on massive loans with massive interest. Every hour of delay is massive amounts of lost money. Stopping trucks, cement mixers, trains, waste interest, paid labor, and so much more. You are effectively forcing hundreds of workers to go on strike for the day.

So go to the protests, the lib ones, the socialist ones, the planned parenthood ones, and talk to them about blockades. A lot of times, folks will follow anyone with a bullhorn and a banner. They're the clipboard and yellow vest of protests.

 

Anti-anarchists sometimes like to accuse "anarchists" of having terrible opinions, and then if you're like "I'm an anarchist and that's not true" they say "Oh, I mean internet anarchists."

I've seen some of you mirroring this rhetoric and complaining about "internet anarchists." This is playing into anti-anarchist rhetoric that discredits anarchism and divides the movement. You don't have to prove you're one of the good ones.

We used to call those people "baby anarchists." They weren't pretenders who we had to distance ourselves from, they were uneducated people who needed some pointers on things like cooption, anti-imperialism, lesser evilism and the non-profit industrial complex.

Don't distance yourself from internet anarchists, educate baby anarchists.

view more: ‹ prev next ›