Not with Signal messenger, the company running it hasn't been designated as a gatekeeper under the DMA rules. You can see which services will be affected on the Wiki page (only WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger currently).
Muehe
joined 2 years ago
Der OP hat da nen Link mit Kontext oben hin gepackt, aber ich fühl mich trotzdem noch als wäre ich hier bei c/Aneurysmapfostierungen.
Signal protocol ≠ Signal messenger
AFAIK you could always have selfhosted a Signal server, you just can't interact with the "normal" Signal messenger and its network.
No, the DMA has nothing to do with RCS, at least not directly.
Yes, WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger were initially just XMPP servers, but have since had proprietary expansions.
In the context of the DMA both of them will be forced to make interoperability with other third-party messengers possible, since Meta has been designated a "gatekeeper" under the new regulation. Meta has announced they plan on doing so via an implementation of the Signal protocol.
There are some provisions in the Digital Markets Act that go in that direction. It only took effect roughly 3 months ago though, so remains to be seen if it works out as intended.
Yeah they knew the series might not get renewed for another season, so they threw this ending in as a way to be prepared for either eventuality.
By underlying narrative I meant the microwave background radiation plot though.
Do the lights provide the same info as the beeps?
Yes, but whether you have lights or just beeps depends on your board. I think yours does not have the lights, just the speaker pins.
So the circle is where a little speaker should be attached:
Sometimes these come with the case, but in your case not apparently or the PC guy would have attached it. You can buy these pretty cheap (one or two bucks) and they look like this:
When you have one attached and start the PC the mainboard will run some tests, and if it detects a problem there will be a pattern of beeps coming out of the speaker. You can look up what this pattern means in the handbook somebody linked above.
Carla Hinrichs bei Jung & Naiv klang da irgendwie anders.
Hab ich noch nicht gesehen, danke für den Hinweis. That said, sie ist Listenplatz Nummer 3. Das hieße wenn ich deren FAQ richtig verstanden habe sie wäre erst bei ~600.000 Stimmen/~2,1% drin.
Ich glaube allerdings nach wie vor, dass das keinen Effekt haben wird. [...] Wenn der/die eine LG Abgeordnete, der/die es vielleicht rein schafft, dann dort life vor denen protestiert, wird das denke ich eher unfreiwillig peinlich, aber sicher niemandes Abstimmungsverhalten beeinflussen.
In der Not frisst der Teufel Fliegen... Wie gesagt mir würde es sogar schon reichen wenn die da nur den Cicero machen. Einfach bei allen anderen Themen nach Gewissen abstimmen, aber vor und nach jeder Rede immer schön sagen: "Der Klimawandel muss besiegt werden!" Bei jedem Thema den Kontext zum Klimawandel suchen und hervorheben. Den Konservativen bei jeder Gelegenheit ins Gewissen reden mit "Ja aber denk doch mal einer an die Enkelkinder!" Wer weiß, vielleicht gewinnt ja diesmal die Republik...
Strictly speaking this is incorrect, although the situation is somewhat complicated. There are laws that can be and were used to limit its redistribution (mainly the rule against anti-constitutional propaganda), but there are dissenting judgements saying original prints from before the end of WW2 cannot fall under this, since they are pre-constitutional. One particular reprint from 2018 has been classified as "liable to corrupt the young", but to my knowledge this only means it cannot be publicly advertised.
What is interesting though is how distribution and reprinting was prevented historically, which is copyright. As Hitlers legal heir the state of Bavaria held the copyright until it expired in 2015 and simply didn't grant license to anything except versions with scholarly commentary. But technically since then anybody can print and distribute new copies of the book. If this violates any law will then be determined on a case-by-case basis after the fact.