MrBubbles96

That doesn't sound like her getting spooked because you didn't have an insta, it sounds like she got spooked because instead of being straight up and going "I mean, I do, but it's old and I never really used it at all" you got weird and made up some weird BS about it.

And I know it's that because not only would it make me raise an eyebrow if some random did something like that to me, I always tell people "Unless you've got a Whatsapp, its either text me or call me. The two social medias i have are ancient, I barely used em in the past, and the logins are lost to time I'm pretty sure." Never given people weird vibes or anything by being honest like that, and we more often than not have a pretty nice time.

Also, being mindful of one's privacy does not make said person anti-social. I'm pretty protective of mine, but i still reach out and talk to my friends and family near daily via face to face or messaging, am pretty receptive to a stranger or acquaintance wanting to have a chat or a coffee with me after work, all that jazz. That I don't like the thought of Meta, Samsung, Google, and Microsoft snooping around people's info, trivial as it may or may not be and thus distince myself from them (within reason, mind. I can cut myself off completely, but that'd be making both life, work, and everything inbetween too much of an unnecessary hassle), doesn't diminish any of that.

His other comments seem to imply that since it didn't happen to them, it doesn't happen on Windows period. That's just rejecting reality.

I've never protrayed Windows as overly terrible in my comments in this thread...or at least, I didn't mean to if it came out that way (i stand with it being a hassle to actually get it installed tho. Had to jump through so many hoops just for it to pick up the only drive plugged into my PC and recognize "oh hey, it's a valid drive". And this was Win10, not 11 either). Windows as an OS is fine, and has its own problems and quirks just like every other OS in existance does. If anything my problem with it comes from Microsoft basically going "no, you're going to use the OS you paid a liscene for how we say" and them (I assume it's them, anyways) reverting several of the changes I made to my settings with updates + it being so heavy to install--to where laptops and such that CAN'T handle it still come shipped with it by default despite preforming horribly because of it. But i never brought any of those up, just the fact that one of those updates messed up my install so bad I had to do a re-install, and it was annoying to actually do. I didn't call it a devil worship machine or whatever the heck the other guy keeps calling Linux lol

Still doesn't disprove my point that Windows bricking itself is a thing that happens:

https://www.minitool.com/backup-tips/bricked-computer.html

Qoute: "PC bricked issue often occurs, especially you have installed a Windows 10 update. When searching for “bricked computer” in Google, there are many forums on this topic...Well then, how can you fix the bricked computer in Windows 10/8/7 if the brick is caused by the operating system itself (soft brick)?"

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/windows-updates-keep-bricking-my-laptop/7eb5ac2d-fff0-41a7-b008-c59946be4333

https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/windows-10-pc-bricked-overnight-please-help.3599394/

"I think its important to point out that Windows has been forcing updates on me that just bluescreen me. Once i blue screen it resets the system to its original config and it boots normally. When asked to schedule a time for the update, I chose 4/27. Sure enough after that, cant boot once."

https://www.reddit.com/r/ZephyrusG14/comments/pguu58/recent_windows_11_update_bricked_my_g14/

First comment: "This is related to Windows 11, everyone is facing the same issue right now. It seems to be due to an expiring certificate."

And we can keep going. Microsoft can screw up and ship an update that bricks your hardware. It's happened before, and will continue to happen again. (And just so we're clear: Ubuntu, Red Hat or other Linux maintainers, and even Apple with their products, are not exempt from this either. They're also human and can mess up. But we're not talking about Linux or Mac, we're talking about Windows sometimes bricking itself, so they're irrelevant to this conversation) Why you're so adamant on denying it ever happens on Windows even tho evidence is a search away and instead paint it as solely a Linux problem is beyond me

It's not what I think tho, it's what's written by others....unless I'm somehow imagining actual search results of people detailing their experiences of their machine, yes. bricking themselves. That, or Google results and Microsoft's own forum posts are lying. Along with several other threads, videos, and examples. Which i very much douvt is the case here.

It's a man-made thing. No man-made thing is infallible. They can and sometimes do break or mess up. That shouldn't be hard to understand, i should think

What's unintuitive about sudo apt install wine?

In the interest of fairness, maybe the first time you ever do it, yeah, I can see it as someone completely new to this thinking it's black magic (heck, I've used Linux as my daily OS for a while and some of the things users are able to do with their skills, i describe as black magic lol). After a while tho, it becomes no big deal, and the user might even prefer doing it that way because it's quicker (IMO) to que up a buncha packages to install one after the other vs hunting them all down and installing one by one. But yeah, point is, it can look unintuitive if you're new to it...but once you're used to seeing it, it's like "ah, ok, it's just another way to do things"

And there also nothing really stopping you from installing stuff the ol Windows way, if that's how you prefer to do things. Just open your package manager and look up what ya need. Or even open your browser and go to the offical site, they might also have official packages to download.

Either way is valid and up to the user's prefrences. Never understood why both sides sometimes make it sound as if there's only one way to install stuff on Linux (not saying you're doing that here specifically, to be clear, but I've seen others do so. The other person kinda is tho).

never had Windows brick on me

Congrats, if that's true. You're the exception, not the rule. Windows has bricked itself on several users with a couple of updates before tho (and I know this because one of those is exactly when i learned how much of a removed it can be to actually install on your system), and a quick basic search proves that yeah, this isn't some rare thing, the OS tends to do that sometimes to the frustration of many.

So we're basically saying the same thing about the subject then. Wonderful. Dunno how you got me saying "It's not going to affect the life of the person viewing it unless said person lets it" to mean "it applies to people who damned themselves down this road willing and people who has an actual problem with it" in the context of OP's question

Now, "Ungenerous interpretation of what [you] said" where, exactly?

You asked "does it include compulsive gamblers?"

And I answered No, because I answered the OP's question from a general perspective--not asking as someone who already has a compulsive urge to masturbate/drink/gamble/whathaveyou. The first one can be affected either positively or negatively by something, if they let the habit control them vs the other way around, while the other's already affected in a negative way, so i didn't bother bringing them up. (Not even touching on the fact that it should be obvious, or well, at least it is to me, you CANNOT advise or help an addict in the same way you're going to advise a person whose curious/a bit green on something they wanna try)

Wait, was it in my anecdote about me deing a drunk? If that's the case, then there was a failure to communicate on my part and I apologize. I didn't mean to imply that you said "all porn bad", i said it to point out how distiling something that to a basic category like "all alcohol is bad" without the nuance of "it's less the thing and more the different people interacting with the thing" to be....well, bad, and reductive because context matters.

Eh. It be like that sometimes. Re-reading everything again, i was pretty clear in what I said in both the reply to the OP and comments back to them. They and anyone else wanting to take it as something contrary to what I actually wrote down (which itself isn't rocket science) is on them, really.

OP didn't imply thqt he was asking about it at an unhealthy level, so i responded to that.

The alcholic is already in a habit. What i put was not written with the idea of an addict in mind, simply that the act (porn) is not some evil, rotten thing that should be avoided like the plague, but should instead be treated as a neutral thing and viewed with moderation--should a normal, non-addicted person decide to do so at all.

Also, that you used that specific example for your comment, considering I actually did put the bottle down a while ago because yeah, boiling it down, it pretty much was destroying my relationships and not doing my already weak ass immune system any favors, made me crack a smile NGL

You're speaking about a compulsive habit at that point, so no. That's a completely different animal than what i meant.

I wrote the above along the lines of "Is the action bad in of itself? No. CAN it turn into a bad habit and hurt a person? Yes. All depends on the person interacting with it"

Like, as a former (recovering? Don't drink anymore, besides, at best, 1 bottle at gatherings, if even that, and sometimes during hangouts) alcoholic, yeah I'll call out when companies and other people try to enable someone with a drinking problem to keep going...but I'm also not gonna go around and say "all alcoholic beverages bad" because I recklessly abused something that is known to hurt the body if used without restraint and paid for it. Maybe it's a poor comparison since porn can't physically hurt you the way alcohol can (tho it can mentally warp a person in some ways, especially if they're younger/have nobody to teach them properly about sexual education) but that's the only example I can give and i hope i got my point across.

As someone else put it perfectly in another comment: it's just porn. It's not going to affect the life of the person viewing it unless said person lets it.

IMO, tho, as with most things things in life, just doing as the Greeks did is a good rule of thumb: you doing this in moderation? you're good.

Yes. The question was "why Arch?", but specifically the question was asked because Arch demands some level of competance from the user when it comes to fixing and maintaing their own system by nature of it being a rolling release. So yeah, expierence is relevant here.