MrBubbles96

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Guessing because the one's who downvoted saw this as "low effort" that doesn't tell them anything, really. (There's no mention of any DE, or what they did to customize it...it's just the terminal and a request for a wallpaper, really). FWIW, I can see it's Uwuntu (i think...) would be nice to see the whole desktop tho

Btw, OP, or really, anyone, how'd you upload the image? Everytime I've tried it it says the image is too large.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Depends. If you mean in gameplay terms, no, there's been some changes. All the perks were reworked, and not only all function correctly, they all have a tangiable effect on your build, and visiting a ripper doc is now a requirement instead of something you do once or twice.

If you mean in level design terms, like are more missions open ended like the Maelstrom one in the beginning? Yeah, it's the pretty much the same. I don't think that'll be addressed in anything other than the DLC tbh.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I don't know about it always being good...Objectively, it launched in a very very rough state, regardless of the platform (my PC is not a cheap rig, still had numerous problems when i played). The recent patch ironed out a lot of the game's problems (tho the level scaling was a step backwards IMO, tho YMMV on that), and yeah, a part of me wants to give props to CDPR for fixing the screwup they themselves made....but I also feel nobody should be giving them props for meeting--and not all the way, mind you--an expectation they themselves set with their own pre release trailers, interviews, and the likes.

Said it before, I'll say it again: they should've just gone the Baldur's Gate 3 route. Because we basically went from Beta, Early Access, to (arguably) the full release of this game in the 3 years it's been out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

And I am once again reminded why you never stick your dick in crazy. The lay might have been worth it, but all the bullshit after? Fuck that, I'd rather find my someone whose not gonna make my canities worse even if the suck in the sack. Shit, I'm no pornstar myself so.

Please tell me you either put as much distance as humanly possible from her, got a restraining order on her ass, or, and god help them, she found someone else to haunt...

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago (3 children)

She had the gall a week later to chase me down the street begging to speak to me and apologizing...i was still being followed for 1/2 mile.

I would have heard her out if i was you. Not because I'd take her back or believe a single word that comes out of her mouth, no, no, but the sheer audacity of doing that + the desperation to get you to listen...nah, whatever fiction she came up with HAS to be some Oscar-worthy writing instead of the whole "it was a mistake!" if she borderline stalked you to share it, and then thought for a second she still had a shot with you after.

That, or her (non-existent) balls are bigger than her brains.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, Mint's pretty solid overall, but as I too game a lot when not working, I didn't wanna have old packages on me. I'd imagine getting them up to date or fixing issues that arise from them is headache inducing, so i'd rather just have everything fresh. Besides, I'm used to Arch syntax so I know I'ma go "sudo pacman -Syu" if i move to something else lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Listen, if an idiot like me hasn't blown up his PC in the two years I've been on Linucx (1 yr and change with Arch), you'll be alright lol

I'm gonna assume the reason Arch is "scary" for some folks is because it's a rolling release, which yeah, it can cause problems, but IDK, I've had much less problems with Arch vs any stable release I've tried not named Linux Mint (and even there, the volume and mic on my laptop failed to get picked up. An easy fix, but again, never had that happen on Arch). Sure, fixing a problem might seem daunting, but like...the internet and forums are right there. You can look up and ask for help. Then again, YMMV. I had to basically learn to ask for help and hunt down answers because of my time with Windows (geez, that was a headache. I'm convinced there was something wrong with my install, because I fought with Windows so much until i just couldn't anymore), so when I switched to Linux, the whole "it doesn't always work" argument fell off my back.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Go for it, I say. YMMV, but Pop!_OS for me was a headache, just didn't play nice with my rig. I'd go with Endeavor over vanilla Arch, just to make the install process simpiler.

For the terminal, you can learn how to use it at a basic level, I believe someone here already posted some commands. Write those down and what they do, or use Endeavor's Welcome Screen, and you'll be alright...or you can just install Pamac (yay pamac on the terminal. Go with pamac-all or the one that says no snaps) or Octopi, or re-enable the Discover Store if you wanna go with KDE or Gnome software and have a GUI menu for all that. If you feel lost, Google, the Arch wiki, and the Endeavor forums are your friends. The Arch wiki especially is super detailed, and can be applied to Linux in general.

Transitioning, i feel, YMMV. Again, i had a pretty bad time with Pop!Os and I wasn't a big fan of adding PPAs in general. It's nice not having to deal with any of that, personally. And up-to-date packages means my stuff isn't behaving oddly for the most part (there's breakages, small and big, but that's with all distros. Something is bound to screw up sooner or latter) Only thing I mind is constantly having to babysit the system...but that's the nature of rolling releases (by babysit, i mean updating is a daily thing. i know i can leave it for a week or two without upgrading and it'll be fine, but outta habit, I do a system wide update (yay in the terminal, or through pamac if ya got it) before shutting down for the day.) but I haven't found a stable release I vibe with, so I put up with it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Theme: depends. I'm rocking Gnome on my laptop, so something like Otis looks good in it. Kripton or Jasper (what I typically use in XFCE) also look nice regardless of DE IMO. Just depends, but mostly, it's a dark theme so my already meh eyes are spared a flashbang. Very original, I know.

Icons: Gruvbox Plus. Dunno, just always kinda feel it. Guess I like the designs? Also love me some Win10Sur and Reversal Icons.

Cursor: Bibata, typically. Oreo Cursors, if i feel like adding more pazazz and color...which is most of the time, honestly (also helps make my mouse easy to find. Not that my desktop is cluttered it's just nice to immededly know where it's at with a glance).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

No problem, hope ya find what you're looking for there

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Depends.

Do you mind a Rolling Release? If not, try Arch, either Vanilla with the AUR enabled or EndeavourOS. The default package manager (Pacman) + the AUR has pretty much everything you could need without resorting to flatpaks, snaps, or appimages (or, did you mean something else when you said you'd "like to use the default package manager exclusively"?).

If you want something you don't have to constantly babysit, OpenSUSE Leap is a good choice and has as big of a selection as Arch does, or so I heard, anyways. There's also Ubuntu if you don't mind Canonical's Snaps (or know how to get rid of em). You also get the benefits of DEB packages IIRC, but don't know if you'd count them as part of the "Default Package Manager" or not...and off the top of my head, that's it. I'm sure there's more, but none that you can get away with only using native files on it are coming to me

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Randomness? What do you mean? If you mean the dice rolls, they're not too bad if you stick with the class you picked/created in the beginning of CC. And I'd argue they does serve the experience: showing the player's progression.

Because you're not some master of all jack of all traits in Morrowind. You can be, but you don't start as one. You start as a poor soul fresh off the prison boat who kinda knows how to use a weapon and can't run for long (or maybe you can do both pretty well, but suck at magic, jumping, or wearing heavy armor, or you can't tell the end of a spear from the front so using one efficiently is going to take a while. All depends on how you made your character), but as you keep adventuring and doing those things your character kinda sucks at, you get better at them--doing much more damage and barely missing hits at all with weapons-- and rather than running slower than molasses, you can can run faster and farther than ever before.

view more: ‹ prev next ›