Monstrosity
This is a LemmyShitpost, so, yes absolutely.
Fuck you & fuck this insulting post.
#2
[This comment has been removed after user thought better if engaging with dingdongs.]
Great, but then is AI art generated by a human not entirely intention? Would that not endear you more towards it?
The piece OP posted is a great example of art that is entirely conceptual, which seems to me the best use case for AI art.
Alright, well I suppose that is an answer, then. I'm not sure I am convinced, but I can appreciate that you've got a solid reason.
Always? You sure?
I don't entirely understand your argument concerning working for no pay?
There is loads of mass produced "art" made by humans, probably in China or India. Is this superior to AI art? Do you all appreciate the "time & effort" put into these?
I may have missed your point, though, like I said I don't think I completely grasp your argument.
Well that's just not true at all!
Artists have lots & lots of motivations to work & many are not even remotely emotional about what they produce.
This piece in particular is a concept piece, so I don't know why the technique used to create it has any bearing at all? This is the core of my confusion. I feel like people are just kind of reactionary towards AI art, whether it really matters or not.
That said, I 100% agree on your points about stolen work & I personally believe every single model should be public domain.
My solution is to browse subreddits without signing in so whenever I go to up vote or down vote anything I can't and think, "oh right," then go back to Lemmy (which is quickly becoming a higher quality experience anyways).