Mondez

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

Copyright infringement for me but not for thee.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago

Won't someone think of the billion dollar businesses?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Pirated content of course has no advertising in it, so it makes sense to pay good money for a service that has adverts in it or how else am I going to learn about all those fabulous products I just have to buy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Doesn't matter for a distribution, Apple historically also shipped some gpl tools like bash and Samba, they just provide the source for what they have to.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (5 children)

They'll just do an Apple and publish the source to the bits they have to while keeping the bits they don't closed source making the os as a whole closed source.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Disappointed to see so many people picking and choosing what is and isn't acceptable to pirate.

We don't know the OP circumstance and it's a big assumption that he can just pay and it not be an issue in some way.

Average people deserve to get paid but we aren't talking about scamming some custom content out of them, they already made the material in question and it's a sunk cost, selling copies is as much rent seeking behaviour as when it's done by big companies.

Also, let's not use emotive incorrect language like "stealing" as it's not, it's copyright infringement, no one is stealing anything.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

How do you even start to quantify something like a TV show? Without piracy would you have had subscription services, seen it free when it came on local TV and/or bought a box set of it? Similar situations exist for other media too, which "full price" are we talking about?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hence the term "sunk cost fallacy".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

It's more like the old school file sharing networks of like napster and emule. You give it a directory to share and it makes files in those directories available to download on the network and you can download what other people are sharing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting that AAA games are such premium, high quality products they should only be experienced by a few wealthy individuals who can afford the budget to buy them? Because that is what your analogy suggests.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

At a glance it looks like software to roll your own pirate bay equivalent? Not sure why you'd want to do that exactly when there is bitmagnet to sit on top of the torrent dht?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Copyright laws are not universally enforceable in general, so I fail to see your point. They are enforceable in the US where the big AI companies looking for a free lunch are operating though so let's focus on that shall we?

If I have to pay to use copyright material to train my own Actual Intelligence, I don't see why companies with massive development budgets should get to use vastly more material to train their "AI" models for free.

view more: next ›