Mister_Feeny

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

The other day I was seeing 13.1 million people, now I'm seeing 4-6 million, these are some big gaps.

A ton of people either way, but anyone know why the discrepancies are so big?

I can't even imagine how people are counted for things like this. The one I went to was in a town of about 100k total people so I'm sure it was on the smaller side of things, but if asked how many people were there I'd guess around 2000, but that would still just be a completely wild guess essentially. Is that how they count attendance for these things, wild guesswork?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, you're absoutely right here, neither the Daddies nor the Zippers were ska bands. They were part of that brief lived big-band/swing revival in the 90's you mentioned.

To get a little pedantic about it, the real defining trait of ska is the "ska rhythm" where the guitar plays on the off-beat, or the upstroke, or "skank". The Specials - A Message to You Rudy is a pretty good easy to hear example of that guitar rhythm.

But to most people, the thing that was most noticeable about ska at first listen was the horn sections. Especially in the 90's third wave, when rock and rock adjacent bands were not really using horns anymore. So it was really easy to lump in both CPD and SNZ as "ska", as they both came out around the heyday of third wave ska, when the Bosstones, Reel Big Fish, etc. were all blowing up, even though they didn't use ska rhythms at all.

One thing that is kind of funny to me is that Sublime was way more of a ska band than either of them, but since they didn't have a horn section, I never much heard people refer to Sublime as ska.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More likely lined up for Switch 2 launch. My local Best Buy barely carries anything for pc parts, and I don't think mine is the only one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, still a 404 for me. Not a big deal, at least for me though, as I was still able to find the article, and if anyone else has my issue, my guess is that my link will work for them?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I got a 404 clicking on your link cuz it looks like a bunch of unnecessary stuff after pj6t.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c628n68zpj6t works for me, in case anyone else has same problem.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Yo I think you got the wrong number.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

No, it will be on steam day one. They had to figure out a new way to shoot their sales numbers in the foot.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like this question would also fit well in xkcd's what if section.

https://what-if.xkcd.com/

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

Just gimme another beer you brain dead hick!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah, if it was 480p, I would notice. I'm not 98 years old with cataracts.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Using firefox on windows 10 and I have none of these issues. Maybe windows 11 is what breaks it?

view more: next ›