Marvelicious

As it turns out, there's already a project... https://github.com/ChazLayyd/Bambu-Lab-Klipper-Conversion/blob/main/README.md

Just did this yesterday. You won't need the whole afternoon. It was surprisingly simple.

I'm unconcerned. I knew what I was getting into with a walled garden ecosystem, and though I didn't expect them to dive straight into the enshittification deep end, I figures they would eventually do something fairly shady. The real question is how long it will take to release the first X1C-Klipper refit.

Hydroponic Saffron sounds like the name of a jam band of some kind...

I keep meaning to start some saffron crocuses. Good to know they aren't fans of indoor growing.

Politicians are such profoundly unserious people.

Meh, I don't think they're quite foolish enough to go full Juicero, but I won't be updating my firmware.

Let me put it a different way: your premise was that a level of precision with less than 10ms of variance is necessary. I'm saying that much of the library of recorded music demonstrates that this is not the case.

If your premise is simply, "I'd like to be more precise with my timing," then by all means. It sounds like you're already doing the right thing though: lots of practice with a click track. There's not really a shortcut to forcing your synapses to fire with that level of precision, you just have to keep doing it.

There's an old joke about someone in New York asking for directions... "How do you get to the Met?" "Practice"

"10ms is barely acceptable" 🤣 I'm sorry, but that's the funniest thing I've read so far today. Do you realize how little of the music you hear on a daily basis meets that criteria?

🤣 That would be absolutely PERFECT.

🤣 "Everyone uses this thing... it must be possible to monetize that somehow!"

I'd really like to hear their "underpants gnome" business plan for how that's going to work.

Nope, you're missing the point entirely. There's absolutely nothing stopping me from walking into the other room, tearing apart my X1C and rebuilding it with, let's say a klipper board, except that it works quite well at the moment... No printer bought right now is likely to be any different in that respect. You're trying to act like it's an i-phone, but it just isn't.

Ten years... Someone apparently thinks they're funny. I'd like to see their ten year old 3d printer that is still essentially using stock or equivalent components and hasn't been essentially re-engineered from the ground up. Are you enjoying manually leveling that bed with thumbscrews and a scrap of paper? Still printing on tape, or maybe a piece of glass? This whole hobby is still moving relatively quickly and I wouldn't be surprised to wind up working with additional axes or other unpredictable innovations ten years from now. Certainly we'll have gone through multiple "ultimate" build surfaces by then.