I've been using Zen which is nice and has some stuff removed that we don't want.
But it'll only be around as long as Firefox is around.
I've been using Zen which is nice and has some stuff removed that we don't want.
But it'll only be around as long as Firefox is around.
That's what proxmox has too, but snapshots aren't backups and aren't being sent to a remote backup server.. You're also not supposed to keep snapshots around for very long, whereas I have backups going back several months.
Or are you sending snapshots to a remote server? I think ZFS can do that, so maybe that's an option I can look at.
I'd say about 2-3 minutes all in total.
That's also how you know it's a cheap chinese phone lol, because all the high end flagships don't have headphone jacks (other than Sony I suppose).
This looks interesting, how do you handle automated backups of all the VMs/Containers? Their docs kind of seem to say "stop everything and figure it out", but with Proxmox I'm used to it handling everything automatically to my PBS server every night.
That's what I'm wondering as well, how do we differentiate cooling towers and the heat from those vs actual exhaust emissions..
It's more that I have to re-enable scripts on most websites, so it's not giving me much benefit.
It's definitely not an easy migration in my experience, because they run rootless and they cannot auto-start without making a system service for every stack, there is a lot that needs to change in a compose stack, especially with file permissions for shared mounts.
Not really an issue IMO.
Doesn't windows have storage spaces or something like that? I'm not familiar with windows for any kind of server stuff but I remember reading some things.
It's a drive pooling application for windows, lets you merge multiple drives into a single mount.
Yes but it should always be opt-in. Just present a nice message telling users how it helps development with a checkbox they can hit.